By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Is the Titanfall review embargo a bad sign?

Dark_Feanor on 10 March 2014

Brace yourselves. clickbait reviews are coming.

One can always place "the lack of SP" to remove 1 or 2 score.

PS: Will people point the lack of MP in inFamous SS?



Around the Network
walsufnir on 10 March 2014
mtu9356 said:
Most likely it's because the game has some bugs or balance issues. They don't want reviewers to play it until the day 1 patch is out.

 

So you assume there are bugs and ballance issues that were not present in the beta almost everyone liked? Interesting.



Azerth on 10 March 2014
arcane_chaos said:
so when does the embargo lift?


I belive in a couple hours



FATALITY on 10 March 2014
Azerth said:
arcane_chaos said:
so when does the embargo lift?


I belive in a couple hours


awww :(

back to arkham origens until than



”The environment where PlayStation wins is best for this industry” (Jack Tretton, 2009)

J_Allard on 10 March 2014

Well guys it looks like the decision was clearly made to mask what were sure to be scores that must have been terrible.



Around the Network
BraveNewWorld on 10 March 2014
NavyNut said:
Normally an embargo is not a good sign, I don't think I've ever seen a game scoring in the 90s having an embargo on reviews.

All games have review embargoes. The reason this is seen as a big deal is because the embargo lifts so late.



"On my business card I am a corporate president. In my mind I am a game developer. But in my heart I am a gamer." - Satoru Iwata