By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - 720p vs 1080p, Does Resolution matter? - A Utilitarian Perspective

Blu Ray is a niche market because the vast majority dont give a shit or notice the difference in resolution. I certainly dont see the difference between upscaled DVD and BR which is part of the reason I dont buy the format. Im sure its better and preferred but near the bottom of things needed when it comes to entertainment. Sony fanboys wouldnt care about it and Xbox fanboys would care if the consoles were reversed. Gamers dont even care as seen by the lack of interest in PC gaming compared to consoles.



Getting an XBOX One for me is like being in a bad relationship but staying together because we have kids. XBone we have 20000+ achievement points, 2+ years of XBL Gold and 20000+ MS points. I think its best we stay together if only for the MS points.

Nintendo Treehouse is what happens when a publisher is confident and proud of its games and doesn't need to show CGI lies for five minutes.

-Jim Sterling

Around the Network
whatever said:
DirtyP2002 said:
I think the differences from 900p upscaled to 1080p and 1080p is not important at all.
The only reason some people are counting pixels is that you CAN count them.

"better graphics" was and is always a matter of taste. There are things like lighting effects, artstyle, animations, facial expressions etc etc and IMO all of these things are way more important than resolution. But all of these things are based on personal preferences. Resolution is not. That is why people use it today.

Resolution meant shit last gen. If you asked for the best looking game last gen, very few would mention Wipeout, because it runs at 1080p.

I am not getting tired to mention that MY personal best looking game of last gen is Fable II, because the artstyle and the atmosphere just felt special and really was a beauty.

Maybe I am crazy, but I still think that The Last of Us, Halo 4, Gears of War 3 or Uncharted are great looking games and not one of those games was able to get past 720p at all. I still think X for Wii U looks really really good, but I am not into JRPGs.

Gameplay > visuals and for the visuals the resolution is the least important aspect.

Of course it's not important if your an XBone fan.


I even played CS 1.6 on 800*600 to get better, because I felt my aiming improved with it.



Imagine not having GamePass on your console...

Rafux said:
I think is more about Xbone costing 100$ more than PS4 while being inferior hardware and multiplats are now better on Sony's console.

I'd rather pay $100 more dollars to play Halo, Forza, Gears and Titanfall. Your perceptionof better is very relative/personal and you should keep that in mind.



Goatseye said:
Rafux said:
I think is more about Xbone costing 100$ more than PS4 while being inferior hardware and multiplats are now better on Sony's console.

I'd rather pay $100 more dollars to play Halo, Forza, Gears and Titanfall. Your perceptionof better is very relative/personal and you should keep that in mind.

I said inferior hardware. I never said PS4 is better than xbone I did said MULTIPLATS are better (forgot to said tech/resolution wise)

Does it have better hardware? The answer is yes as multiplats and developers have shown.



Saying resolution doesn't matter too much goes against the very fabric of our reasoning for upgrading any piece of entertainment device. See a 720p TV but you can comfortably afford a 85" 4K TV? "Resolution doesn't matter". You have $2,500 to comfortably plop down on a gaming rig. You could choose a single GTX 600 over dual sli GTX Titans because "resolution doesn't matter". You wish the Xbox One would've used dvd's as their main gaming medium as the Xbox 360 did because at the end of the day "resolution doesn't matter"... :-/

When people say that phrase, you in essence go against EVERYTHING in us that propels us to break boundaries, to push the limits of technology. All for what, your "fanaticism" for a company making technologically inferior hardware to its opponents, ON PURPOSE?!

Every console generation, the promise of better graphics is the single most compelling reason people upgrade to the next gen (8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 64-bit, etc.), and some of you are SERIOUSLY trying to make an argument that we should plop down ANY amount of money for a next gen console, and just totally ignore the overall value to its competitors because..."resolution doesn't matter"?  That's utterly ridiculous...*smh*



Around the Network
Rafux said:
Goatseye said:
Rafux said:
I think is more about Xbone costing 100$ more than PS4 while being inferior hardware and multiplats are now better on Sony's console.

I'd rather pay $100 more dollars to play Halo, Forza, Gears and Titanfall. Your perceptionof better is very relative/personal and you should keep that in mind.

I said inferior hardware. I never said PS4 is better than xbone I did said MULTIPLATS are better (forgot to said tech/resolution wise)

Does it have better hardware? The answer is yes as multiplats and developers have shown.

Ok... Ryse is still the best looking game on the next gen consoles and it is on the inferior hardware.



To be honest I would prefer the PS4 versions of multiplatform games to match the 720p or 900p visuals but instead increase graphic fidelity with more onscreen detail etc. I think developers are short-changing the ps4 by simply uprezing the graphics. I'd like to see more onscreen buildings, characters etc on ps4.

I remember playing games on ps2, gamecube and original xbox and the xbox had more detail. In an fps game it could be extra buildings in the distance, better textures on the ground, better clouds or explosions. Just stuff that added to the immersion.

My main tv is a 1080p 3D LCD set and before it was a 720p plasma set. I can't tell the difference in resolution from where I sit. 60fps is clearly better than 30fps though.

I would prefer they used the ps4 extra power for higher frame rates or more detailed graphics personally.



Goatseye said:
Rafux said:
Goatseye said:
Rafux said:
I think is more about Xbone costing 100$ more than PS4 while being inferior hardware and multiplats are now better on Sony's console.

I'd rather pay $100 more dollars to play Halo, Forza, Gears and Titanfall. Your perceptionof better is very relative/personal and you should keep that in mind.

I said inferior hardware. I never said PS4 is better than xbone I did said MULTIPLATS are better (forgot to said tech/resolution wise)

Does it have better hardware? The answer is yes as multiplats and developers have shown.

Ok... Ryse is still the best looking game on the next gen consoles and it is on the inferior hardware.

I'm going to use your words here:

"Your perception of better is very relative/personal and you should keep that in mind."

Ryse is the best looking game for you, Killzone Shadow Fall is for me. We both wouldn't be wrong to say that but is hard to compare them because they are different games in a difference genre if they were multiplats it would be a more fair comparison.



Of course resolution matters, the only people who say otherwise own a console that is no capable of hitting 1080p without sacrificing fps or something else. So they proceed to tell themselves that resolution doesn't matter or that gameplay>resolution, basically anything that would help them sleep at night.



Rafux said:
Goatseye said:

Ok... Ryse is still the best looking game on the next gen consoles and it is on the inferior hardware.

I'm going to use your words here:

"Your perception of better is very relative/personal and you should keep that in mind."

Ryse is the best looking game for you, Killzone Shadow Fall is for me. We both wouldn't be wrong to say that but is hard to compare them because they are different games in a difference genre if they were multiplats it would be a more fair comparison.

Genre doesn't have anything to do with discussion between KZ and Ryse, because both target realism. If they were multiplats is not the right answer because most games developed exclusively to X1 reveal higher graphic fidelity than the ones produced to be multiplat.