By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Are XBONE graphics closer to Wii U than PS4?

Captain_Tom said:
Too_Talls said:
Captain_Tom said:
DirtyP2002 said:
Best looking console game is a Xbox One exclusive. That should give you the answer.


Hahahahahahahahha!  Oh you guys make me laugh!


I don't know why people get so butt hurt over this.

What looks better is subjective, it's no fact what game looks th best when so much people disagree. Some say killzone some say rise. Why laugh when someone decides the one you don't agree with looks better?

 

Seriously.


I am laughing for these reasons:

1) Most people agree that Killzone looks better, but yes it is semi-opinion.

2) Ok so if it is close let's see which one is doing more: 24 players plus up to 24 bots with automatic weapons and grenades going off everywhere VS.  5 guys fighting in QTE's.

3) Some people act like Ryse not looking like garbage somehow makes up for every other game looking like garbage.

The point is some MS fanboys keep stating that Ryse is "The best looking console game."  I believe Killzone looks miles better, but I don't keep stating it like it is some objective fact.  When I wrote "Hahahahha" I was litterally laughing.  It's funny to me how some people are clearly overcompensating for a massive power deficiency.  

I see no reason why I can't say something made me laugh on an  internet forum.


1) wrong.

2) Killzone did not even have voice chat. What is this, 1997? If you go that route: Killzone SF does less than Halo 3. True story.
At the end of the day this has nothing to do with a powerful machine.

3) The point is that it comes down to the game. That is all I am saying. Forza and Ryse are visually impressive games (especailly for launch games) so the console IS capable to deliver such titles.

I am just getting tired of people making a oh so big deal out of the resolution for certain games. This generation is not even 4 months old ffs. Just compare Early Xbox 360 games like PDZ with Halo 4 or early PS3 games like Motorstorm with GT6.

I for one enjoyed last gens blockbuster games like Gears of War or Uncharted and I still think those are great looking games. Now we are getting games that look even better and all VGC does is counting pixels. The games I am looking forward to the most right now are Titanfall and Quantum Break and I just don't give a fuck about the resolution for these titles, because I can't wait to get the hands on a really cool online Shooter and I can't wait to see how live action TV series will be used for a game. This is the interesting stuff and the reason I spent 500€ on a new system and not the resolution.



Imagine not having GamePass on your console...

Around the Network
DirtyP2002 said:
Captain_Tom said:
Too_Talls said:
Captain_Tom said:
DirtyP2002 said:
Best looking console game is a Xbox One exclusive. That should give you the answer.


Hahahahahahahahha!  Oh you guys make me laugh!


I don't know why people get so butt hurt over this.

What looks better is subjective, it's no fact what game looks th best when so much people disagree. Some say killzone some say rise. Why laugh when someone decides the one you don't agree with looks better?

 

Seriously.


I am laughing for these reasons:

1) Most people agree that Killzone looks better, but yes it is semi-opinion.

2) Ok so if it is close let's see which one is doing more: 24 players plus up to 24 bots with automatic weapons and grenades going off everywhere VS.  5 guys fighting in QTE's.

3) Some people act like Ryse not looking like garbage somehow makes up for every other game looking like garbage.

The point is some MS fanboys keep stating that Ryse is "The best looking console game."  I believe Killzone looks miles better, but I don't keep stating it like it is some objective fact.  When I wrote "Hahahahha" I was litterally laughing.  It's funny to me how some people are clearly overcompensating for a massive power deficiency.  

I see no reason why I can't say something made me laugh on an  internet forum.


1) wrong.

Ok buddy lol.  Look I don't have the time to add 100 links, but sure you believe what you want to.

2) Killzone did not even have voice chat. What is this, 1997? If you go that route: Killzone SF does less than Halo 3. True story.
At the end of the day this has nothing to do with a powerful machine.

DIdn't have voice chat?  LOL someone clearly has never played the game!  The Xbox One didn't let you manage your storage.  So by your logic it is behind the PS2 right?

3) The point is that it comes down to the game. That is all I am saying. Forza and Ryse are visually impressive games (especailly for launch games) so the console IS capable to deliver such titles.

I am not impressed by Forza at all.  Congradulations!  If you turn down detail a ton and take away all dynamic effects you can pull off 1080p.  Well guess what?  My old $300 Netbook could technically run COD4 in 1080p if I turned absolutily every detail down.

I am just getting tired of people making a oh so big deal out of the resolution for certain games. This generation is not even 4 months old ffs. Just compare Early Xbox 360 games like PDZ with Halo 4 or early PS3 games like Motorstorm with GT6.

I for one enjoyed last gens blockbuster games like Gears of War or Uncharted and I still think those are great looking games. Now we are getting games that look even better and all VGC does is counting pixels. The games I am looking forward to the most right now are Titanfall and Quantum Break and I just don't give a fuck about the resolution for these titles, because I can't wait to get the hands on a really cool online Shooter and I can't wait to see how live action TV series will be used for a game. This is the interesting stuff and the reason I spent 500€ on a new system and not the resolution.

You are completily missing the point as to why websites keep bringing up resolution.  YES THEY WANT FANBOY HITS, but after that we get to this issue:  MS said the difference would be negligable.  Not only did they say that, they kept bringing it up all the time and even went as far as to say "I can't wait for the truth to come out."  The truth is out, and now the online community is proving just how wrong MS was.  720p is less than half the pixels of 1080p.  The Xbox One is half as strong, and people need to get over it.  Until everyone has, the hammer is gonna keep coming down.

MS should have just said right out of the gate that it IS weaker (Like Nintendo did with the Wii).  Or at the very least they should have just said "No Comment."





TheLegendaryWolf said:
If all systems had equal quality games, it would be something like this...
PS4: 1080p 60 FPS
XB1: 1080i 30 FPS
Wii U: 900p 30 fPS


No, it definitely wouldn't be like that. That is not what we are seeing at all with wii u. For mainly 2D games perhaps with minor 3D bits like Rayman Legends;

All formats 1080p 60FPS incluidng 360 and PS3 with no frame rate drops. Likely PS4 and Xbox One could support 4k resolutions for the same game.

Traditional fps games aiming at a 60fps rate where possible like Call of Duty

PS4 1080p 60fps (frame rate drops to 45 fps under extreme load)

Xbox One 720p/900p 60fps (similar frame rate drops at 900p to ps4 at 1080p)

Xbox 360 880x720 60fps (down to 50fps under load)

PS4 880x720 60fps (down to 40fps under load)

wii u 880x720 50fps (down to 25-30fps under load)

For racing games where there are less cpu requirements and more a test of pushing data at the gpu the wii u's superior gpu architecture and more abundent memory enables better textures and a more constant frame rate. This is only really going by one game 'Need for Speed' as some race games like Sonic transformed are superior on 360 and PS3 technically.

At the moment on average the wii u is performing well below 360 and PS3, often missing graphic detail, occasionally lower res but almost always lower frame rate.

It is not fair or accurate to portray the wii u as close to ps4 or xbox one. The current level of performance offered by wii u would put it below 360 and PS3 for most games. This is performance level is also backed up by the wii u components fitted, its power consumption, its fabrication process and every other possible stream of evidence. There is currently no evidence to indicate the wii u should perform over 360 and PS3 on average and this is exactly what we are seeing as real world evidence too.



Look at Ryse and Forza 5.....no the X1 is not closer to a WiiU in terms of visuals.....how is this even a topic? O_o



Nintendo Switch Friend Code: SW-5643-2927-1984

Animal Crossing NH Dream Address: DA-1078-9916-3261

Cartoon graphics can look just as good as realistic graphics. Take Pikmin 3 for example.



Around the Network
PikminDude123 said:

Cartoon graphics can look just as good as realistic graphics. Take Pikmin 3 for example.


It almost seems like they just want photorealism on every game possible for some odd reason.



PikminDude123 said:

Cartoon graphics can look just as good as realistic graphics. Take Pikmin 3 for example.


In this respect yes you are correct.  I believe the topic is about general power though.  Still, this won't stop me from getting a WiiU for the next Zelda game.  =P



Nintendo Switch Friend Code: SW-5643-2927-1984

Animal Crossing NH Dream Address: DA-1078-9916-3261

troll topic is troll



I think the wiiu can do ryse



VITA 32 GIG CARD.250 GIG SLIM & 160 GIG PHAT PS3

coolguy said:
I think the wiiu can do ryse


Not a chance.