By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Sony Insider Thuway: The Power Gap Between X1/PS4" will increase with The Order:1886

tuscaniman99 on 08 February 2014
ethomaz said:

tuscaniman99 said:

No upscale but it isn't native 1080p and RAD admitted if it was native 1080p they would have to use a lesser form of AA, most likely FXAA. I have no doubt the game looks good but I don't expect it to look much better than Ryse, which had extremely clean IQ.

RAD said that 4xMSAA in 1920x800p was more demanding than 1080p with noAA... so I'm sure they can for example have 1080p with 2xMSAA.

Yeah... I expect it to look way better Killzone SF... so Ryse won't be close.

Ryse arguably looks better than Killzone.



Around the Network
FlamingWeazel on 08 February 2014
dane007 said:
deskpro2k3 said:
pezus said:
globalisateur said:
Aerys said:
globalisateur said:
J_Allard said:
Hope it looks good. I am a little disappointed to read in places that it's just a Sony version of Gears though.

Graphically so far it's been kind of meh. The textures in the environments have been nothing at all impressive, but the special effects have been amazing.

I agree with you. Seriously. The game will probably be great in itself because RAD never did a bad game (gameplay, fun, good metacritic) and that's what is the most important eventually.

But graphically the blurry screenshots released so far have been disappointing, I mean it looks OK but I am afraid some people will still find Ryse more next gen that the Order 1886 and IMO they will be right I am afraid . Too blurry, too cartoonish (like KZSF) and not enough sharp with ultra high resolution textures which is for me the best (easier to see) next gen "wow" effect.

But I still hope to be wrong about it.


You need to check your eyes guys, it's an emergency ! This is by far the most next gen game we saw ! But of course, if you take the worst quality screenshot...

But if you take the best screenshot :

 

 

it's just beyond of everything we saw before, and thinking these screenshots are from old build ( october ) , stunning !

I have already seen those very compressed high resolution pics.

I stand by what I said. It's not a realistic game like Ryse with ultra sharp textures & assets but is more "cinematic" "foggy" "blurry".

Artistically It reminds me some comics exactly like Killzone. You can't mistake Killzone for a picture someone would have taken in the future. Here it's the same, you can't mistake those images as a real picture.

You could definitely mistake some Ryse screenshots with a real picture.

Gameplay? Not really

The textures are nothing to write home about...


I would like to know the woman who gave birth to those guys. They all kinda look identical.


if you have played the game then you would know the game play is like the batman games. heck just looks like  a nicer looking gears of war with gears of war mechanic lol

The game plays nothng like the batman games lol, Batman has stealth, open world flying and gameplay and the combat is way deeper.



dane007 on 08 February 2014
FlamingWeazel said:
dane007 said:
Aerys said:
globalisateur said:
J_Allard said:
Hope it looks good. I am a little disappointed to read in places that it's just a Sony version of Gears though.

Graphically so far it's been kind of meh. The textures in the environments have been nothing at all impressive, but the special effects have been amazing.

I agree with you. Seriously. The game will probably be great in itself because RAD never did a bad game (gameplay, fun, good metacritic) and that's what is the most important eventually.

But graphically the blurry screenshots released so far have been disappointing, I mean it looks OK but I am afraid some people will still find Ryse more next gen that the Order 1886 and IMO they will be right I am afraid . Too blurry, too cartoonish (like KZSF) and not enough sharp with ultra high resolution textures which is for me the best (easier to see) next gen "wow" effect.

But I still hope to be wrong about it.


You need to check your eyes guys, it's an emergency ! This is by far the most next gen game we saw ! But of course, if you take the worst quality screenshot...

But if you take the best screenshot :

 

it's just beyond everything we saw before, and thinking these screenshots are from old build ( october ) , stunning !

The fourth pic is CG not ingame. Again  usually high res pics look better then the game themselves. i guess feb18th can't come sooner enough lol

Proof? Keep downplaying.

Proof that its not cg?  it can go both ways. good job for trying though. i give you credit for that. On track with your repsone ,, if you look at all the images apart from that one you can clearly see that image 4 has textures that can only been done on a suped up expensive computer. i never said this game was bad looking but clearly that image is not gameplay graphics. 



dane007 on 08 February 2014
tuscaniman99 said:
ethomaz said:

tuscaniman99 said:

No upscale but it isn't native 1080p and RAD admitted if it was native 1080p they would have to use a lesser form of AA, most likely FXAA. I have no doubt the game looks good but I don't expect it to look much better than Ryse, which had extremely clean IQ.

RAD said that 4xMSAA in 1920x800p was more demanding than 1080p with noAA... so I'm sure they can for example have 1080p with 2xMSAA.

Yeah... I expect it to look way better Killzone SF... so Ryse won't be close.

Ryse arguably looks better than Killzone.


Agreed. For me having both games,, i would say that Killzone has bettre environment  graphics while Ryse has better character models, aniamtion  and particle effects then Killzone. In saying taht both games are best looking next gen games so far.



NYANKS on 08 February 2014

This game looks freaking beautiful. People need to get their eyes checked, the detail is astounding.



Around the Network
Justagamer on 08 February 2014

I love the atmosphere, environments, I hope they nail the gameplay, because I want this game to be good. If it is, day one for me.



dane007 on 08 February 2014
NYANKS said:
This game looks freaking beautiful. People need to get their eyes checked, the detail is astounding.


agreed pics are beautiful but then again pictures are just pictures and we all know at that times it gets touched up. there have been cases where the pics looked more beautiful and alot sharper then the actual game itself.for all we know the pics from inforrmer could or could not be touched up. i hope when the gameplay arrives on feb18th that ity natches those pics.



FlamingWeazel on 08 February 2014
dane007 said:
FlamingWeazel said:
dane007 said:
Aerys said:
globalisateur said:
J_Allard said:
Hope it looks good. I am a little disappointed to read in places that it's just a Sony version of Gears though.

Graphically so far it's been kind of meh. The textures in the environments have been nothing at all impressive, but the special effects have been amazing.

I agree with you. Seriously. The game will probably be great in itself because RAD never did a bad game (gameplay, fun, good metacritic) and that's what is the most important eventually.

But graphically the blurry screenshots released so far have been disappointing, I mean it looks OK but I am afraid some people will still find Ryse more next gen that the Order 1886 and IMO they will be right I am afraid . Too blurry, too cartoonish (like KZSF) and not enough sharp with ultra high resolution textures which is for me the best (easier to see) next gen "wow" effect.

But I still hope to be wrong about it.


You need to check your eyes guys, it's an emergency ! This is by far the most next gen game we saw ! But of course, if you take the worst quality screenshot...

But if you take the best screenshot :

 

it's just beyond everything we saw before, and thinking these screenshots are from old build ( october ) , stunning !

The fourth pic is CG not ingame. Again  usually high res pics look better then the game themselves. i guess feb18th can't come sooner enough lol

Proof? Keep downplaying.

Proof that its not cg?  it can go both ways. good job for trying though. i give you credit for that. On track with your repsone ,, if you look at all the images apart from that one you can clearly see that image 4 has textures that can only been done on a suped up expensive computer. i never said this game was bad looking but clearly that image is not gameplay graphics. 

The onus is on you to have proof you are the one trying to say it is CG.



Lawlight on 08 February 2014
dane007 said:
tuscaniman99 said:
ethomaz said:

tuscaniman99 said:

No upscale but it isn't native 1080p and RAD admitted if it was native 1080p they would have to use a lesser form of AA, most likely FXAA. I have no doubt the game looks good but I don't expect it to look much better than Ryse, which had extremely clean IQ.

RAD said that 4xMSAA in 1920x800p was more demanding than 1080p with noAA... so I'm sure they can for example have 1080p with 2xMSAA.

Yeah... I expect it to look way better Killzone SF... so Ryse won't be close.

Ryse arguably looks better than Killzone.


Agreed. For me having both games,, i would say that Killzone has bettre environment  graphics while Ryse has better character models, aniamtion  and particle effects then Killzone. In saying taht both games are best looking next gen games so far.


Ryse is a very limited game though. Much smaller environments. Less than 70% of the pixels that KZ:SF has. Framerate is between 26-28 compared to KZ:SF's 30-40.



Krill on 08 February 2014

Thuway's 60fps argument? Lol

Is there one game that PS4 runs locked at 60fps that XBOX One doesn't?

Is there a PS4 AAA exclusive (little indie games don't count) that runs 60fps locked?

So far, XBox One is the only console that has AAA game running 60fps locked.

I'm not denying PS4 is currently most capable console graphically but this BS needs to stop. 

Saying your games are 60fps when they are 60fps capped but can go into 30's and normally sit in the 40's is bullshit.  You guys are being played. Stop being sheep.