when we see results of what they say then they will be heading towards perfection
| R.I.P Mr Iwata :'( | ||
![]() |
|
|
when we see results of what they say then they will be heading towards perfection
| R.I.P Mr Iwata :'( | ||
![]() |
|
|
JoeTheBro said:
Really I'd say they're on the path to perfect but they certainly aren't there yet. |
LOL Why so pessimistic, bro? And how could you hate out-house developement? Some of them have better ideas than Nintendo.
From a gamer POV not even close. They are still a far more insular Japanese company than Nintendo was even in the 1990s, when Yamauchi gave NOA far more authority to do things like go ahead and make say ... GoldenEye.
Today, Retro Studios would probably be laughed out of Nintendo's offices if they dared to ask to work on some off the wall project not based on a pre-existed Nintendo Japanese IP.
1990s Nintendo > modern Nintendo in almost every way from a gaming POV IMO. The only thing this iteration of Nintendo has over 90s Nintendo is EAD Tokyo.
Mystro-Sama said:
LOL Why so pessimistic, bro? And how could you hate out-house developement? Some of them have better ideas than Nintendo. |
But Nintendo's perfect. How could that even be possible?
JoeTheBro said:
But Nintendo's perfect. How could that even be possible? |
What are you getting at exactly?
1992-1999 Nintendo >>>>> modern Nintendo
EAD Tokyo is really the only one even keeping this gap close.
Mystro-Sama said:
What are you getting at exactly? |
I'm poking fun at your thread title while presenting a serious point. Nintendo's games are top notch.
"More VC support" remains to be seen. They already promised N64 and GC games a long time ago. Still, they spend time porting old NES games that nobody cares about.
Come now, you know Nintendo has to be running on Android before it can achieve Perfection.
Merely modelling its strategy after Android will allow it to achieve Semi-Perfection at best.
