By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - Which monitor did you end up with? poll: max resolution,90% plays full hd or higher

 

Whats your max possible resolution?

HD+ 1600x900 33 10.68%
 
UXGA 1600x1200 4 1.29%
 
FULL HD 1920x1080 203 65.70%
 
WUXGA 1920x1200 23 7.44%
 
WQHD 2560x1440 33 10.68%
 
WQXGA 2560x1600 6 1.94%
 
QSXGA 2560x2048 5 1.62%
 
Total:307
SvennoJ on 28 January 2014
kirby007 said:
SvennoJ said:
kirby007 said:
SvennoJ said:
I like to use a projector for gaming, and they're stuck at 1080p. Waiting for an affordable 4K projector.

really? you taught me some interesting thing last time and then you mention this!?

And what was that?

Maybe i'm overreacting but you had all the tech info, and teached me that 4p=/=4k

Ah you mean 2160p =/= 4K. Well this one is actually real 4K:
http://www.projectorcentral.com/sony_vpl_vw600es_4k_projector_review.htm
It's also $15k which I don't have. Plus it's no good for gaming, too much lag, 120ms. (Although it doesn't lookl like they tested it with a native 4K source, if there is already such a thing as a GPU supporting 4096x2160 over HDMI 2.0)



Around the Network
Munkeh111 on 28 January 2014

I have 2 1080p ASUS monitors, but they're only 1 1/2 years old so I'm not even thinking about replacing them yet

If I had tons of cash to spare, then maybe I'd get a 4k monitor, but I'd more interested in getting something larger for 4k and 23" is a good size for a computer screen



JEMC on 28 January 2014
SvennoJ said:

Ah you mean 2160p =/= 4K. Well this one is actually real 4K:
http://www.projectorcentral.com/sony_vpl_vw600es_4k_projector_review.htm
It's also $15k which I don't have. Plus it's no good for gaming, too much lag, 120ms. (Although it doesn't lookl like they tested it with a native 4K source, if there is already such a thing as a GPU supporting 4096x2160 over HDMI 2.0)

There isn't. Neither the GTX 780Ti nor the R9 290X have HDMI 2.0.

Don't know about DisplayPort 1.2.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

JEMC on 28 January 2014
Munkeh111 said:
I have 2 1080p ASUS monitors, but they're only 1 1/2 years old so I'm not even thinking about replacing them yet

If I had tons of cash to spare, then maybe I'd get a 4k monitor, but I'd more interested in getting something larger for 4k and 23" is a good size for a computer screen

I'm keeping an eye on the announced 24" 4K monitor from Dell.

Sure, I'd have to set Windows to zoom the characters and all that, but it will still look good. And if I ever get a GPU able to run games a that res, I won't have to use AA again.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Viper1 on 28 January 2014
vivster said:

Here's an example to illustrate my point: the GTX780Ti aka the strongest single GPU card on the market right now barely handles Crysis 3 aka the most demanding game on the market at 60FPS and still has frame drops below that.

So until current high end cards can handle every current game at 60FPS minimum on ultra and 1080p I'm fine with that resolution.

All cards will have fluctuations in frame rates but you're seeing a limitation to 60 fps because of a Vsync issue with Crysis 3, not because of the card themselves or the demands of the game.

Look at other games.
BioShock Infinite at 120 FPS at 2560 x 1440
Metro: Last Light at 75 FPS at 1920 x 1080
Tomb Raider at 55 FPS at 2560 x 1440
Battlefield 4 at 80 FPS at 1920 x 1080
Hitman: Absolution at 85 FPS at 2560 x 1440
Sleeping Dogs at 80 FPS at 2560 x 1440
Batman: AO at 100 fps at 2560 x 1600
CoD: Ghosts at 90 FPS at 2560 x 1600
Far Cry 3 at 70 FPS at 1920 x 1080



The rEVOLution is not being televised

Around the Network
ibrahim on 28 January 2014

1366*768 :D



Mohasus on 28 January 2014

2560x1440 PLS panel.



kupomogli on 28 January 2014

1440 x 900. I've had my monitor for 12 years.



Hakker_nl on 28 January 2014

1920x1200 Dell 2405FPW and a Dell 2412M.
I had 2 rules no TN panel and 1920x1200 and yes those rows of 120 pixels make the difference.



Predictions
I will win the internetz
LemonSlice on 28 January 2014

I have a 27" Dell monitor with a 2560x1440 rez. I also mave MacBook Pro with a 2560x1600 resolution. Both IPS and flicker free. When it comes to building or buying a comp or any other device, the display is the absolute priority to me.