Acevil on 21 January 2014
| garywood said: I've always found something creepy about when someone takes a very strong position on an issue that doesn't directly affect them. By all means be a feminist as a man, if 'feminist' just means belieiving in equal rights and opportunities. But to take a strong stance on such a controversial issue (one that may not have any actual real world implication given that it's such a niche product) when it's not actually related to your own gender/race/belief system, it's just so clearly an example of someone who is VERY politically correct and self-righteous. This guy isn't saying what he really thinks. He's saying what he thinks he should think. Simple as that. |
While I do not share his believes in any sense, couldn't one argue that it is sort of required that both sides address the issue. You don't simply solve an issue with only one side on the table, if that were the case, you would get an unbalance towards the other side, because it would just tip the other way (given logical progression).
Also thank you garywood for posting something I actually feel is a point of view and a discussion.
