So the infringement didn't come from the actual 3D screen (which Nintendo buys from Sharp) but the implementation of the 3D camera in relation to the 3D screen?
| fedfed said: It looks like for future 3ds only.... 2ds will be fine ;) |
2Ds uses the same cameras.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1gWECYYOSo
Please Watch/Share this video so it gets shown in Hollywood.
It astounds me how this guy ever won this case
You cant even find Tomita on google
Soleron said:
Tomita tried to sell the tech to Nintendo and were turned down, then their tech appeared in the 3DS. This is not a patent troll case. |
His tech isnt even in the 3DS.
Its not even remotely similar. Come on judges
Justice rules supreme as they say.
Dr.EisDrachenJaeger said:
His tech isnt even in the 3DS. Its not even remotely similar. Come on judges |
They ruled it is similar enough.
The problem is with the whole concept of a patent and the relevant law, not with the judges.
The two previous courts ruled in favor of Nintendo and yet the Judge assigns this shit to NIntendo after all this time?
Why?
A couple of bucks on each sold is a lot though from a business standpoint.
Nintendo borrowed some million dollars for free and now they have to give them back without many interests.
I hope that in the meanwhile they played with them to make more money. Because if they didn't, then why borrow money in the first place?
| UnknownFact said: Nintendo borrowed some million dollars for free and now they have to give them back without many interests. I hope that in the meanwhile they played with them to make more money. Because if they didn't, then why borrow money in the first place? |
What the hell are you even saying?
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
