so imagine the 3DS sells 100m, which it probably will, these guys would get 200 million dollars for those cameras that nobody uses?
This isn't from East Taxes, is it?
| Galaki said: This isn't from East Taxes, is it? |
Tomita tried to sell the tech to Nintendo and were turned down, then their tech appeared in the 3DS. This is not a patent troll case.
You dirty Nintendo! Stealing tech from people! 
"I've Underestimated the Horse Power from Mario Kart 8, I'll Never Doubt the WiiU's Engine Again"
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:
Yea but they are not manufacturing the Camera or anything like that... Yea there are R&D Costs and patent but apart from that... they can basically just sit back and get a royalty from Nintendo. I am not saying they don't have the right to have the royalty, I am just saying that there isn't any future cost involved to have this royalty |
Yeah that's true.
I believe Nintendo already has to pay Tomita $15 million in damages; so is the 1.82% that must be paid by Nintendo per system at whole sale for future 3DSs sold or is it for both future and past 3DSs sold?
now 1.82% is any kind of deal?
thats nothing for Nintndo. of course is a lot for the guy. good for him
| supernihilist said: now 1.82% is any kind of deal? thats nothing for Nintndo. of course is a lot for the guy. good for him |
1.82% of every 3DS sold. He could make 34m out of next 10m 3DS' sold. Of course I'm just estimating here so that's not an exact figure but it should be something close to that.
Sigs are dumb. And so are you!
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
