probably your definition of wealth

wealth normally means purcahsing power

its like saying if there was a pizza with four slices and there were four people to eat it so everybody got one.

now if there was 2 pizza's with 4 slices each and there were 4 people to eat it.everyone now got more.but if there were 8 people so everyone got the same as the first case.

and if you have even more people sharing the same resources,its less for everybody.

resources and wealth stays the same.they are just transfered to whoever is controlling it.

i know that

but what i was pointing towards is there is no way ever to pay back the USA debt.

sorry there is one way,if the dollar hyperinflates which is coming but that is as good as paying debts in your dreams

Resources are a limiting factor to a certain extent, but as we learn how to make more things or make things in different ways, the amount of usable resources goes up. The fracking process is a case in point: it was gas that sat under the earth in such a way as to be useless, but geologists and engineers thought about it, and now it's a resource.

No... I'm using what your arguement on wealth is.

That's more or less the definition you've given.

Using your example now...

in modern times.   There is far higher pizza to people ration then there has ever been before.

People in modern times are getting way more slices of pizza then they had any other point in time.

Not seeing how that effects the point i made, or in general the control of the federal reserve by the government.

Additionally, the US totally could pay off it's debt if the US govenment was serious about it.  We have not yet reached a point where intrest payments are greater then what the US government takes it.

If the US government decided on a debt reduction plan, we could totally pay back the debt.

Indeed, the sequester is a good start on that, just that it does so with all the grace and consideration of a drunken civil war surgeon.

Competing Currencies Can End the Fed.  

For those who support the concept of a central bank/federal reserve, do you believe the Fed should be audited? If not, why? If so, do you think an audit of the Fed would or would not lead to its termination? Why, or why not? 

End the fed!!!

that is effecieny,i agree with what you say.this happens whenever technology and science fields expand but they too need investment and research

now if USA didn't have so much land,where would it do such things

first there is not that higher pizza to people's ration,i'm talking worldwide not just the USA.US has benefited from the FED in the short term because of easy credit.

plus wealth is not higher pizza but higher purcahsing power which translates into hgiher standard of living.