Soundwave said:
fatslob-:O said:
Soundwave said:
fatslob-:O said:
Soundwave said:
Yes lets just have the industry make military shooters and nothing but.
|
I'm not asking them to make more shooters and BTW open world games are doing extremely well like GTA, skyrim, assassins creed, etc so there's no need to reduce gaming to 1 genre.
I'm only asking platinum games to start making something relevant.
|
You know honestly f**k GTA and Assassin's Creed. And Skyrim too (gasp!!!).
Dudebros can go suck it, Nintendo should offer something different, even if they move into making more core games again.
I'm sick and tired of every game being made for 16-year-old boys or the 30+ year old men who are still mentally 16. Gimme something different.
Bayonetta is wacky, so what. I say make it even crazier next time out.
Should Nintendo broaden their horizons? Sure. Should they copy what's popular on the market now? Hell no. It's an oversaturated market. The only concession I would make is to have a FPS franchise, but even there I would not touch any of the crap military tropes that the market pushes out. Go buy the James Bond license and make a spy FPS.
|
You realize that most of the gamers are 20 to 30 year olds, right ?
Nothing wrong with making a game crazier, just make it relevant. Zelda and the older DMCs were as wacky as hell and guess what ? They were relevant!
Again I'm not telling them to copy the the popular titles because they'll usually end up failing.
A spy FPS ? I would rather another stealth FPS but nintendo doesn't really have experience in making stealth games either so I doubt that'll end well.
|
GoldenEye sold 6+ million copies on the N64. If they want a beacon franchise for older gamers go with that. Bond is 100x cooler than any lame dudebros character (sit down, Master Chief, no woman is picking you over 007) and has worked well for Nintendo in the past, and doesn't have to be another lame military shooter.
If Nintendo wants to make Bayonetta 2 "revelant", then instruct Platinum Games to make the best action game period. This game should be the best in its genre, it should be a 90+ on Metacritic, it should be far better than the first game. If it's a wacky game, then don't fight it. Embrace it, make a wacky marketing campaign around it. If it's sexy, then dial that up that.
There's an oppurtunity there because no one is really making these types of action games anymore. So why not take advantage.
Same with X. It should be the best Japanese RPG. Metacritic 90+. Don't release it until it is of that quality (either game). There's an oppurtunity here too as the Japanese RPG genre has grown stale, Nintendo can take the crown in this genre type if X is an even better game than Xenoblade.
That's the best thing Nintendo can do, is reassert their brand as the one that has the best quality games while broadening out into different genres. Mario 3D World is a great way to start it, I would carry that same philosophy over to Zelda -- that doesn't release until it's the best Zelda game ever. If I'm Iwata I don't care if that means delaying it into 2015.
Even if certain games flop, the integrity of the brand is more important than any one game, any one console, any one hardware cycle even.
|