J_Allard said:
I posted the whole article as well. The difference is in what you selectively bold. You don't think a comment about a game taking racing sims to the next generation is flattering? Some of you act as if they shat all over the game but then said even though it doesn't deserve it, it's the standard for sim racers. All they say is despite lack of polish. Which to me says the gameplay is good enough for next gen. And that's really all that matters. I am yet to read negative things about the actual handling model and physics of the game, it's all small graphical sacrifices. Give me a next gen game that actually does something to deserve being next gen, over something like Killzone 6 which does nothing really next gen, but sure looks purty. Some of the people in this thread seem to prefer the other way around, that's cool I guess. Toodles. |
Main issue is just that the game isn't what was shown and demo'd a few weeks and months back.
They're not the first ones to do it by far, but I'll be honest and say I would think that the Forza which was shown at E3 was maybe not on high end PC's but instead on current Xbox1 hardware but without having to handle the other cars AI on the system itself which obviously they lost after the 180 with always online and always connected to the cloud to power it. The hardware could be the same but it's just having to handle more than they expected without the Cloud.
Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive
