J_Allard said:
I posted the whole article as well. The difference is in what you selectively bold. You don't think a comment about a game taking racing sims to the next generation is flattering? Some of you act as if they shat all over the game but then said even though it doesn't deserve it, it's the standard for sim racers. All they say is despite lack of polish. Which to me says the gameplay is good enough for next gen. And that's really all that matters. I am yet to read negative things about the actual handling model and physics of the game, it's all small graphical sacrifices. Give me a next gen game that actually does something to deserve being next gen, over something like Killzone 6 which does nothing really next gen, but sure looks purty. Some of the people in this thread seem to prefer the other way around, that's cool I guess. Toodles. |
So if we are talking about gameplay on Sims... you will agree that GT6 is better than FM5??? Since that is all that matter.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."