1) The truth is not sexist. Their are differences between what the average male and what the average woman wants from video games and other media. If you worked in a companies marketing department and said that there is no difference in appealing to women and men, you would be fired immediately.

2) I was referring to the Korean nationality to the ethnic group, betraying your obsession with race. People of the Korean nationality  have a greater MMORPG culture than other nations and therefore it makes sense to release an MMORPG in that market. Does not mean all Koreans play MMORPG, just more than average.

3) And he is right, some women are looking for skimpy looking cosplay outfits. Are you claiming he was making an absolute statement about what all women want from cosplay?

TBH if there were more designs like Fenris and Zervan (dragon age), Thane (Mass Effect), Vamp (MGS), there would be a lot less crying about objectifying in games.

The characters I mentioned above were designed primarily towards female gamers. They have a huge fan bases with them and are seen as very attractive characters.

Granted, it's probably a problem that I can up with only 4 of these types ATM, when they are possibly thousands of designs aimed towards men.

I think it's more about equality than a stance about sexual objectifying content.

I'm sure most female gamers wouldn't mind more characters (and designs) like the few I mentioned.

Outside Boybands you didn't get any of that right.

Outside which...

A) You mentioned specific portions of a genre.  As opposed to just videogames which is an entire thing more or less.  A specific niche in a medium is a little bit different then the majority of the content in an entire medium.

B)  Do you see progressive taxation as a double standard?  

White people found blackface funny because of their superiority complex.

You find oversexualized women attractive because of.... your superiority complex.

Otherwise, it would just seem sort of ridiculious and out of place.

As for "White Knighting".   I don't think you know what that term means.

Since as far as I can tell there hasn't been a female in this thread, and relly aren't many on the site in general.  I can't actually even name an active female user on the site off hand.

1) So you've never thought "This game is going to be awesome' or "this game is going to suck" based on the deveoper and past works?  If you open a Hershey Bar wrapper 4 times there is a hershey bar in their, do you not like to assume their will be a candy bar there?   And instead assume their will be a celery stick in their because it's a healthier option?

2)  Not sure what that has to do with a videogame.  It's not like their isn't media where objectifying isn't bad.  I mean that's pretty much the whole point of porn for example.   In media that's primary goal isn't to sexual gratify you though.  There is really little room for objectification.

3) Yes you can.    Kesha for example has a genius level IQ, would sneak into universites to attend lectures and tons of other shit, and people who know this still objectify the shit out of her.  Why?  She's attractive, dresses in sexy stupud outfits and sings about sex.

Using the MGS5 example.  Her outfit is objectifying.  Their is no way around that no matter how much character depth and personality you throw into the character... unless you come up for a reason why she isn't dressed like a normal person like the hundreds of other soldiers that will be in the game.  

It's cheaply transparent.

Like it or not, the majority of hardcore gaming is made up of males, so the industry (which is filled with mostly males) is going to cater to that demographic.

We could see a change if more women showed an interest in computer programing and/or video game design/development, but a las the majority of them seemed to be uninterested in those type of careers. (or anything computer science related)

That is quite an outdated view. I'll think you'll find that marketing is moving away from the idea of targeting specific genders. One recent example is Toys R Us doing it for their toys: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/toys-r-us-to-stop-marketing-its-toys-by-gender-in-wake-of-sexism-claims-8798959.html

Racism is a broad term, and can refer to people categorised by culture, ethnicity, genetics, geography and lots of other things. Making a generalisation of any nationality is racism.

I don't know whether he was making an absolute statement or not, which is why I said it "can also be seen as sexist" rather than "is sexist".

I'm going to stop replying to this thread before i say something that could get me banned. You know nothing about me, how the hell could you possibly know why I like looking at sexualized females? 

Other than labeling me based on your preconceptions.

Not as much as you'd think, no.

 For example, PSP was the more hardcore handheld... yet it's ownership was > 50% Female.

Women make up about 45% of the dedicated console market.

It's just a common misconception made because most girl gamers don't identify themselves as such online / avoid mentioning they play videogames to people casually to avoid all the annoyances that go with it.  (Claims of fake gamer girl etc.)

So your belief is a bit outdated.

How many of these women only have consoles for the sake of Netflix, Hulu, etc? 

45% is a HUGE number. It's hard for me to believe that's accurate. I've played thousands upon thousands of multiplayer games in Halo (3, Reach, and 4), Mass Effect 3, etc and I've only come across a handful of female gamers. 

Only 1 female on my friends list and the rest are male. It may be anecdotal but I think it's enough for a decent sample size.

Edit: If you're going by Xbox Gold numbers, you have to have that subscription in order to watch apps such as Netflix, Vudu, Hulu, Crunchyroll, etc.