By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - ps4 suffers frame rate issue on ghost

Teriol on 05 November 2013

it does not matter, COD looks like shit, it is sad because on pc this game runs 1080p or higher at 120fps so all the 3 next gen systems are too weak agains the PC this time.



34 years playing games.

 

Around the Network
DerNebel on 05 November 2013
Puppyroach said:
DerNebel said:
ClassicGamingWizzz said:
Teriol said:
well 1080p has a cost, nothing surprising here.

how do you know the 720 p version of the xbone does not have framerate problems?

That's exactly what I'm wondering, how come so many people automatically assume that the X1 version won't have those issues?

In what possible way does that matter? So the discussion should still be about these silly things and focus now should be who made the least horrible version or what? :)

It doesn't matter to me, won't buy a next gen console or Cod, so whatever. Also I think I've said that before somewhere, but this is a game that releases on 6 platforms and has a development cicle of 2 years, it's really not surprising that IWs PS4/X1 versions are not perfect since this is the first game they've made for those consoles.

Still I find it very curious that so many people just act as if those problems won't be on X1 just because the X1 wasn't mentioned in the articles (which is because of the review embargo).



DD_Bwest on 05 November 2013

treyarch has always been better, I expected this COD to be a POS, and it really looks like this same old shit. Itll be exciting if something else takes the reign as FPS king, or if that player base gets more evenly split between a bunch of new better games :D



I am Torgo, I take care of the place while the master is away.

"Hes the clown that makes the dark side fun.. Torgo!"

Ha.. i won my bet, but i wasnt around to gloat because im on a better forum!  See ya guys on Viz

Pavolink on 05 November 2013
RolStoppable said:
Looks like PS4 and X1 are current gen... at best.


8GB of RAM is cheap, but not enough.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Mummelmann on 05 November 2013

CGI: Which GPU are you running? 120 fps is pretty damned good, I can barely pull that on Mount & Blade!



Around the Network
forethought14 on 05 November 2013

Well the CPU is trash, so no surprise there...... ;)

On a more serious not, considering how bland this game looks, these devs probably coded the game badly on all consoles anyway.



Madword on 05 November 2013
ironmanDX said:
Funny, the people who called the Xbox One weak for a drop in resolution in favour of 60fps are nowhere to be seen in this thread.

Some of us were at work ;)

Hey we dont yet know what FPS the XboxOne version runs at. If it runs at the same FPS as Sony's but at 720... then thats a bigger problem right? According to the sources on Neogaf both versions were having performance issues, so wouldnt get too excited just yet.

Why is it that the xboxOne version is no where to be seen for another two weeks as it's been embargo'd... very fishy if you ask me.

I think BF4 is a good comparison, that ran at 900 vs 720 and was still running higher than the XboxOne version... who is to suggest anything different this time around.

Finally... one review i read was that the FPS dip was "Occasional" are we really getting over excited by dips in FPS that are occasional?



Making an indie game : Dead of Day!

BrainCramps on 05 November 2013
Pavolink said:
RolStoppable said:
Looks like PS4 and X1 are current gen... at best.


8GB of RAM is cheap, but not enough.

People like ROLSTOPPABLE make me head hurt..Yes because 1 game has frame rate dips at launch Ps4 and x1 are current gen.....Mayeb he is thinking wii-u by accident??

 

Games will still have Fram rate dips from time to time.....Next gen is a lot more powerfull, not miracle machines,d evs will stress them like every other gen



BrainCramps on 05 November 2013
Madword said:
ironmanDX said:
Funny, the people who called the Xbox One weak for a drop in resolution in favour of 60fps are nowhere to be seen in this thread.

Some of us were at work ;)

Hey we dont yet know what FPS the XboxOne version runs at. If it runs at the same FPS as Sony's but at 720... then thats a bigger problem right? According to the sources on Neogaf both versions were having performance issues, so wouldnt get too excited just yet.

Finally why is it that the xboxOne version is no where to be seen for another two weeks as it's been embargo'd... very fishy if you ask me.

I think BF4 is a good comparison, that ran at 900 vs 720 and was still running higher than the XboxOne version... who is to suggest anything different this time around.

Finally... one review i read was that the FPS dip was "Occasional" are we really getting over excited by dips in FPS that are occasional?

Irony is, he was wrong...........same people are posting, what is sad is when the 720P x1 version also has fram drops, they won;t be seen anywhere lol.



vanhalendlrband on 05 November 2013
BrainCramps said:
vanhalendlrband said:
Its funny some of the comments here people thinking it will happen on Xbox One too. The issues didn't happen on 360 or PS3?

When I'm gaming on my PC 1080p makes things a lot harder than 720p, like way harder, even if I'm just slightly below 1080p its nowhere near as taxing as 1080p for whatever reason.

I would not be surprised at all if Sony pulled a 1980's Nintendo maneuver and tried to pay them to push it to 1080p native. While on the other hand Microsoft (being a mostly PC company) noticed the slowdown and told them to keep it at 1080p.

I would be really shocked with the hardware that's in the Xbox One (whether its as good as PS4 or not) would have any slowdown at lower resolution like 720p when the 360 or PS3 didn't have problems the PS4 did.

As someone who build computers and is constantly optimizing I wouldn't be surprised that Sony tried to push this just before the console comes out as a PR tactic but in all reality the PS4 is probably about as much more powerful as the PS3 was over the 360 which was basically both systems constantly trying to find a resolution for each game.

Again I still have to say I'm disappointed both systems weren't able to handle a game like Call of Duty at 1080p 60fps out the box and definitely isn't pushing the boundaries as much as when the 360 and PS3 came out. I'd say they're like 75% of the jump the last gen took. And maybe like 10% of the jump from Super Nintendo to N64.

This has nothing to do with Sony PAying or pushing anything, the devs CONFIRMED, they choose 720P as opposed to 1080P for x1 because it was not playable.....................................The amount of spin, dillusion in your post is pretty scary.


They also said it was 60 fps and its not.

I'm a PC, PS3, and 360 owner, i have no allegiance other than Sega.

What dillusion, i'm going to school for software engineering and have been building computers and tweaking them for over 15 years.

I said "I wouldn't be surprised" if Sony did something like that, i never claimed that they HAVE DONE THIS.

You and the other guy that crossed out my writing need to learn how to read.

If Xbox One doesn't slow down at all at 720p then we all know that Sony would have pushed them to put it into 1080 to try and one up the Xbox One in a PR tactic.

I personally don't care either way, i think both systems are pretty lame that they have any slowdown at all.