By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Infinity Ward CONFIRMS Ghosts on Xbox One is 720p (upscaled), 1080p on PS4

selnor1983 said:
JoeTheBro said:
bananaking21 said:


or you simply have no idea what you are talking about. you keep throwing the same numbers you heard. 85k polygons and 750 joints. Do you know anything about the development of CoD? do you know anything about how CoD is made and what the devs do? if you think CoD isnt technicially impressive in ways you sure as hell do not know anything about these kind of stuff, so please, dont go around throwing numbers you heard trying to impress people and stay on topic. 

If Ryse was 60fps like COD and we use the very flawed approach of assuming it still outputs the same amount of pixels per second, then it would be 636p. If we did the opposite to COD on XBOX, then it would be 1018p at 30fps.

I'm just giving selnor some fresh numbers ;)

KZSF on only the friendly character models has 40,000. BF4 is at 30,000 for only friendlies. 

I actually dont know about COD. But Id guess friendlies are around 20,000 and enemies between 8,000 - 12,000.

Ive seen what 20 characters onscreen in Ryse, all with 85,0000. 

Ryse is doing so much more in multiple areas not just 2 that your hanging onto. Again on 360 every COD is 720p @ 60fps. Does that make Uncharted 3 crap? Because its only 30fps and at times dips to 22 fps?

I'm not sure why you're telling me this. I'm really impressed with Ryse, BUUUUUUUUUUUT,,,,,,, COD isn't as poorly made as you're acting. It's pushing a lot more frames per second and had to sacrifice other graphical features because of it. Of course it will have lower polygon counts.



Around the Network
Captain_Tom said:
ironmanDX said:
Meh. I won't be getting the game personally unless it's a gift from my brother. He got me Black Ops II as a joke for Christmas last year... actually liked the campaign and "clocked it" on the hardest mode first. I'll be as open minded if he gives me Ghosts.

If it's being upscaled, the box will still say 1080i/p on the back.... If a tree falls in the woods and no one is around to hear it, does it still make a sound?


OMG people upscaled means nothing.   It isn't an enhancment, it is just filling in the missing pixels with fluff.  It looks like garbage.


Please, bold the text where I said otherwise. Why will it look garbage in 720 but not in 1080? Nearly every game in the last gen "looks like garbage" then....



^^dude for the love of god stop derailing this thread. go make a thread about Ryse and talk about it there, this thread is about Call of Duty. please, just leave and stop derailing this thread trying to start some stupid argument about Ryse.



selnor1983 said:
JoeTheBro said:

If Ryse was 60fps like COD and we use the very flawed approach of assuming it still outputs the same amount of pixels per second, then it would be 636p. If we did the opposite to COD on XBOX, then it would be 1018p at 30fps.

I'm just giving selnor some fresh numbers ;)

KZSF on only the friendly character models has 40,000. BF4 is at 30,000 for only friendlies. 

I actually dont know about COD. But Id guess friendlies are around 20,000 and enemies between 8,000 - 12,000.

Ive seen what 20 characters onscreen in Ryse, all with 85,0000. 

Ryse is doing so much more in multiple areas not just 2 that your hanging onto. Again on 360 every COD is 720p @ 60fps. Does that make Uncharted 3 crap? Because its only 30fps and at times dips to 22 fps?


no no COD was ever 720p on 360



                                                             

                                                                      Play Me

bananaking21 said:
^^dude for the love of god stop derailing this thread. go make a thread about Ryse and talk about it there, this thread is about Call of Duty. please, just leave and stop derailing this thread trying to start some stupid argument about Ryse.

Yeah take that talk to this thread!



Around the Network
selnor1983 said:
animegaming said:
Option- said:
Ryse will be like Crysis 2,3: Lame as hell and sub 1080p


Probably since crytek isn't really that good of a developer.

Says you.

I really enjoyed Crysis 3. The reviews enjoyed it. Crysis 2 wasnt as good, but I still think its a good game. For example KZ2 I rate about the same. KZ3 however was much below Crysis 2/3, KZ2 imo.


i only played crysis 2 and found it to be one of the most boring and uninteresting shooters i have ever played (which is ashamed cause the game looked promising) and crysis 3 pretty looked exactly the same to me



selnor1983 said:

You are joking right?

It doesnt work like that. Ryse is destroying Ghosts in every technical graphical area. Lighting, Polgon count, animations, AO, Amount onscreen, Environments, Physics, Water, Motion Capture the list is endless. 

Hell Forza 5 is 1080p @ 60FPS and picks up Ghosts and squashes it with its fidelity. The car models are 1 mill polygons. 

There is no excuse. The first party Xbox One developers are proving what is capable in just the launch titles of the Xbox One. Forza 4 is 720p @ 60fps, and Ghosts isnt blowing that away in the graphics department. Ghosts looks last gen. Look at AC4. There isnt much difference between 360 and Xbox One. If that isnt running at 1080p on Xbox One it is without a doubt different architecture. The Xbox One has a different Ram setup and a different GPU set up to PS4. 

The gameplay facial animations alone on Ryse compared to any oter launc title is leagues ahead. 

COD was 60fps @ 720p this gen on 360. Uncharted 30 FPS. Noone said this crap then?

Double standards.

It's not really double standards with what you're pointing out because they're different games, one that clearly looks far better than the other.  A 720p game can look better than a 1080p game.  Go take a picture with a high resolution camera and then reduce the resolution to 720p.  The quality of that image is going to be better than any game that's been out at retail.  The difference is when you take take the same game and you have 1080p on one console, but 720p on the other, it's proof that one console is more powerful than the other. 

If you want to talk about double standards though, think back to when the 360 had near unnoticeable differences in multiconsole games at the same resolution.  Some games had noticeable differences, very few, but i'm speaking of those that didn't.  Yet a lot of Xbox fans bashed the PS3 every chance they got for something that's so minor it's hard to notice even when it's side by side.  The difference this gen isn't going to be minor when it's resolution differences along with everything else the PS4 can do better.  The double standard is that then it was fine for Xbox fans to bash the PS3, but now it's not it's not okay for Playstation fans to make the same comments towards the Xbox One for the same rearson?

If you can't handle it then stay off the internet.  Playstation fans had to deal with it, now its your turn.  Nintendo fans deal with it as well from both Playstation and Xbox fans, but to a much lesser extent, if only because the graphical differences are so obvious.



stolen from Gaf

 



The Xbox One version will have better textures.

Infinity ward has to do something to promote the ps4 version.

so which console will have the better graphics.

the answer is xbox one.



Jega said:
The Xbox One version will have better textures.

Infinity ward has to do something to promote the ps4 version.

so which console will have the better graphics.

the answer is xbox one.

you again, very glad to have you back.

 

keep telling yourself that.