By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Titanfall an Xbox One, 360, PC Exclusive for Its 'Lifetime'

Nkh3 on 30 October 2013

Pitty.It looks good and fresh.Anyway....Multiplayer fps games are not my thing.



Around the Network
binary solo on 30 October 2013
Frank_kc said:
Respawn & EA are betting on a losing horse. They will learn the hard way.

No, even if Xb one sales are below expectations Titanfall will sell well across the 3 platforms its on. Assuming it's a good game of course, which most people seem to think it is.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

shadow_satey on 30 October 2013
Wright said:

Lifetime means "as long as the money keeps moving" for EA, so I should take this info with a grain of salt.

 

 

That being said, HAHA POOR PS4 PLAYERS YOU NO PLAYING TITANFALL HEHEHEHEHE :P


I didn't want to play Titanfall to begin with.



Jaywood2010 on 30 October 2013
Seece said:
CGI-Quality said:

Kowen bloody asks for it though!! As much as I like the guy I do scratch my head sometimes, I think he likes to scrap.

Actually I think a few users have gone absolutely mental these past few months, on all sides.


lmao xD  These plastic boxes are bad for our mental health and sanity xD haha




       

Imaginedvl on 30 October 2013
JerCotter7 said:
Imaginedvl said:
Yep, Titanfall exclusive :) Now this thread is awesome, watching all the PS fans going either :

- Double standard (I can remimber a lot of them saying the game is awesome and will be on Ps4 anyway, now it is "ok" and was "not" expected or needed, LAWL)
- Starting to talk about how Microsoft is evil and Sony is not (like Sony is not paying for such deals...).
- Or again talking about their precious resolution as it was the only thing who really matter (then, I wonder why they are even going for a console and not a PC if it is really the only thing that matters...)

Keep going guys, you are doing well so far...

What have you added to this thread? And I mean anything worthwhile.

I did not bring anything more than all of those I'm talking about, including you obviously. 

Instead of replying to me just look at the 20 pages before and respond to each of them one by one with that kind of stupid reply... I wonder why you sticked on my post... Oh wait, looking at your history... ahhhhhh I see now, make perfect sense :) 

The facts are the facts and all I said is true, deal with it, sorry if it hurts your feeling !



Around the Network
J_Allard on 30 October 2013
forevercloud3000 said:

I also find it funny that some of these are very similar to what Titanfall is trying to accomplish. Dust 514 and Planetside 2 are both similar in scope and theme. I'm baffled as to why Titanfall is being hailed as some sort of completely original idea when Sony has been doing these styles of games for a while (MAG, Warhawk, KZ3 had Mechs and jetpacks, Starhawk, etc).

Yikes, what? Titanfall is a small map close quarter combat type shooter just like CoD, Quake, UT, etc etc. Nothing like Dust and Planetside at all.

Titanfall is getting all the praise because of the gameplay. And no, Sony hasn't been doing "these styles of games" at all. Unless by "styles of games" you're just saying "games with guns" and that is pretty irrelevant. lol @ comparing the mechs and jetpacks of KZ3 to Titanfall.



Wright on 30 October 2013
shadow_satey said:
Wright said:

Lifetime means "as long as the money keeps moving" for EA, so I should take this info with a grain of salt.

 

 

That being said, HAHA POOR PS4 PLAYERS YOU NO PLAYING TITANFALL HEHEHEHEHE :P


I didn't want to play Titanfall to begin with.


Me neither. I was just screwing around.



ExistentialNihilist on 30 October 2013

this very BIG news for MS
BAD for sony and nintendo
not like exclusives bad for gamers who thin wallet



J_Allard on 30 October 2013
Osc89 said:
JayWood2010 said:

Whether MSFT paid for it or not means nothing to me.  It is a business and sorry to tell you but Sony and Nintendo arent innocent when it comes to business strategies either. I will be playing it day one so it doesnt effect me. 


This kind of practise affects everyone actually. MS spent the money not to create a game but to prevent Sony from having it. If they hadn't, both XB1 and PS4 owners would have this game, and MS could spend the money on creating their own game. It doesn't bother you that you could have had 2 games instead of 1?

And this goes for every company. It is bad whoever does it.

Why not both? MS seems to have been able to both secure this incredible game, and make some great looking Xbone games on their own.

Also, would I take one sure fire incredible game, or chance 2 that might not be as good? What's the old saying, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush? Applies perfectly.



Machiavellian on 30 October 2013
DirtyP2002 said:
enditall727 said:
Seece said:
enditall727 said:
Kresnik said:

 

Seems Respawn were looking to port it after initial exclusivity is over.

Guess I'm trying it on PC then, if I get around to it. 

Kinda lame.  Deliberately restricting the initial reach of the IP in return for a bucket of money.  Just hope the bucket was big enough.

Still, good catch for MS.  Game looks interesting.

Looks like MS had to go back to get it fully exclusive.

 

Welp i guess it wont be coming to the Quad. They might aswell just buy Respawn.

Or it was fully exclusive in the first place, just another thing CBOAT has got wrong.

I may be wrong about this but didn't major Nelson seem like he was under the impression that it was a timed exclusive and now today he seems to fully be under the impression that it is fully exclusive?

 

Cboat was most likely right at one point before they changed the deal


Seriously, the way some of you guys talk about Cboat is crazy.
He is WRONG. Period.

This reminds me:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5726915

I believe the issue is that with most rumors, everything is up to change.  Most people that post rumors from different sources only get pieces of info are are quick to post it to gain forum credit.  We see this time and again with a lot of rumors where at one point they probably were true but who knows if the info was old or just something that was thought about..