By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - JESUS WAS A GOVERNMENT PLOT: Confirmed says Joseph Atwill

dsgrue3 on 14 October 2013
Max King of the Wild said:
dsgrue3 said:

Actually never said this ever.

You simply can't be honest as you prove time and time again. In that thread I prefaced all of my comments with the line "I don't believe conspiracies" and then simply proceeded to pose hypotheticals to which you became overtly upset and were promptly banned. By the way, did you learn that standing behind a jet blows you back with ferocity or are you still confused about that?

I was banned for calling you a sick fuck (to which multiple people agreed and knew I would be banned for. In fact, I messaged the mod and told him it was worth it) because you did the exact same thing you are doing in this thread... which is shutting your eyes, plugging your ears, shouting "lallalalalala" and refusing to look at the evidence presented to you. BTW - have you learned to comprehend peoples stance? No, obviously not.

@bold

The irony is profound. Learn the difference between a conspiracy theorist and someone simply being skeptical about certain things just as a way of indulging both sides. You simply allowed your emotions to govern your reactions, which shows complete immaturity on the matter. If you wish to participate in civil discourse, this is vital.

Best of luck.



Around the Network
Max King of the Wild on 14 October 2013
dsgrue3 said:
 

@bold

The irony is profound. Learn the difference between a conspiracy theories and someone simply being skeptical about certain things just as a way of indulging both sides. You simply allowed your emotions to govern your reactions, which shows complete immaturity on the matter. If you wish to participate in civil discourse, this is vital.

Best of luck.

 

No, what you did in that thread was refuse to look at the evidence. THAT, my friend is the irony when your signature states, "Faith: not wanting to know what is true" and by the general way you've carried yourself through this whole thread... The irony is you have acted the way in this thread that you acted in the 911 thread. I didn't let my emotions govern my reactions. You were being a stubborn and sick fuck to which you needed to be called out on it. Before even writing that message I knew I would be banned for it but it was worth it. People, like you, need to be called out on their atrocious behavior even if it means getting a day or so ban.



dsgrue3 on 14 October 2013
Max King of the Wild said:
dsgrue3 said:

@bold

The irony is profound. Learn the difference between a conspiracy theories and someone simply being skeptical about certain things just as a way of indulging both sides. You simply allowed your emotions to govern your reactions, which shows complete immaturity on the matter. If you wish to participate in civil discourse, this is vital.

Best of luck.

 

No, what you did in that thread was refuse to look at the evidence. THAT, my friend is the irony when your signature states, "Faith: not wanting to know what is true" and by the general way you've carried yourself through this whole thread... The irony is you have acted the way in this thread that you acted in the 911 thread. I didn't let my emotions govern my reactions. You were being a stubborn and sick fuck to which you needed to be called out on it. Before even writing that message I knew I would be banned for it but it was worth it. People, like you, need to be called out on their atrocious behavior even if it means getting a day or so ban.

I looked at every piece of evidence you had silly.

How else do you explain my pointing out that airplanes blow you back when you stand behind their jet engines and your complete oblivity on the matter? Honestly man, you don't seem to recall the situation accurately at all. Which is why I mentioned your emotional instablity...

I think you should go find that thread and re-read what happened. I simply played devil's advocate (quite well). You tried to strawman my position several times. You aren't remotely honest about things, but then again you don't often seem to have any idea what you're talking about so it does make sense to attempt to do such a duplicitous thing.



Max King of the Wild on 14 October 2013
dsgrue3 said:

I looked at every piece of evidence you had silly.

How else do you explain my pointing out that airplanes blow you back when you stand behind their jet engines and your complete oblivity on the matter? Honestly man, you don't seem to recall the situation accurately at all. Which is why I mentioned your emotional instablity...

I think you should go find that thread and re-read what happened. I simply played devil's advocate (quite well). You tried to strawman my position several times. You aren't remotely honest about things, but then again you don't often seem to have any idea what you're talking about so it does make sense to attempt to do such a duplicitous thing.

Wow, you still think the argument all this time was if you are standing directly behind a jet engine you wouldn't be blown back... it really just shows what type of person you really are. I think it is you who needs to re-read the thread.



dsgrue3 on 14 October 2013
Max King of the Wild said:
dsgrue3 said:

I looked at every piece of evidence you had silly.

How else do you explain my pointing out that airplanes blow you back when you stand behind their jet engines and your complete oblivity on the matter? Honestly man, you don't seem to recall the situation accurately at all. Which is why I mentioned your emotional instablity...

I think you should go find that thread and re-read what happened. I simply played devil's advocate (quite well). You tried to strawman my position several times. You aren't remotely honest about things, but then again you don't often seem to have any idea what you're talking about so it does make sense to attempt to do such a duplicitous thing.

Wow, you still think the argument all this time was if you are standing directly behind a jet engine you wouldn't be blown back... it really just shows what type of person you really are. I think it is you who needs to re-read the thread.

I simply offered a point of contention against your claim that I ignored the evidence. That was one piece of evidence you presented, which I debunked. Claim defeated.

If you don't understand logic, go take a class at your local community college. I'm sure you can get in, not difficult.



Around the Network
Max King of the Wild on 14 October 2013
dsgrue3 said:

I simply offered a point of contention against your claim that I ignored the evidence. That was one piece of evidence you presented, which I debunked. Claim defeated.

If you don't understand logic, go take a class at your local community college. I'm sure you can get in, not difficult.


You didn't debunk anything. Your poor comprehension skills prevents you from seeing that though. As for logic class... one, why would I need to take it at a community college when I'm at a prestigous college (much better than kentucky thats for sure) and two already took it and passed with flying colors thank you very much....



dsgrue3 on 14 October 2013
Max King of the Wild said:
dsgrue3 said:

I simply offered a point of contention against your claim that I ignored the evidence. That was one piece of evidence you presented, which I debunked. Claim defeated.

If you don't understand logic, go take a class at your local community college. I'm sure you can get in, not difficult.


You didn't debunk anything. Your poor comprehension skills prevents you from seeing that though. As for logic class... one, why would I need to take it at a community college when I'm at a prestigous college (much better than kentucky thats for sure) and two already took it and passed with flying colors thank you very much....

What school is that? And what major?



Max King of the Wild on 14 October 2013
dsgrue3 said:

What school is that? And what major?

Biologcial Chemistry and Molecular Biology with a minor in Philosphy 

Marquette University. Acceptance rate 55% $33600 a school year and ranked 75.

University of Kentucky. Acceptance rate 67% 10k (in state) a year and ranked 119



dsgrue3 on 14 October 2013
Max King of the Wild said:
dsgrue3 said:
 

What school is that? And what major?

Biologcial Chemistry and Molecular Biology with a minor in Philosphy 

Marquette University. Acceptance rate 55% $33600 a school year and ranked 75.

University of Kentucky. Acceptance rate 67% 10k (in state) a year and ranked 119

I don't know anyone who considers Marquette a "prestigious" school.

Minor seems useless to field. 

Not to participate in this rather silly pissing contest, but blanket ranks are pretty useless. I didn't go to UK for every major there. I went for CS. But then again, that wasn't the determining factor in my decision - girlfriend, friends, Kentucky education scholarship, huge UK basketball fan were all in there as well. 

For CS in particular:

UK - #91 overall #16 public

Marq - Unranked

http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-science-schools/computer-science-rankings/page+4

Good major, man. Best of luck with it.



dsgrue3 on 14 October 2013

Oh my god, just clicked on some Marquette link for CS and it says under suggested curriculum "Introduction to Theology" hahahahaha, what the fuck?

http://www.marquette.edu/explore/major-computer-science.php