Sure, if you believe that hilarious, almost insulting it's so stupid PR that you posted.

I am actually surprised and impressed that so many on GAF are responding in the appropiate manner to that nonsense.

Of course, where I come from, saying one thing and delivering something less, is a downgrade. See: Ryse, Crytek says 1080p, actually 900p upscaled. Downgrade. It's not hard. So GG can't push 60FPS on the PS4 in KZ4 MP. Ok, then admit as such and say you couldn't hit the goal. Don't tell us why 60FPS is so much better but then say it's somehow better to not have access to it at all times. I don't like 30 frames per second in my FPS but if that's all you can push steadily, give me that over a fluctuating frame rate.

And I know you and your ilk will respond still defending the lulz PR and I don't wanna seem like I am trying to derail or troll so this will by my last response.

GG said 1080p@30fps... now they are running in 1080p@60fps... I'm pretty sure it means UPGRADE.

Ryse... before 1080p@30fps... now 900p@30fps... in my world this means DOWNGRADE.

Try again... you need to look at the FACTs before post.

I understand what you are thinking: solid 60 to near 60.

That's not at all what's happening here. They (as far as I know) never said it was a locked 60. Hardly any big 60fps game is a locked 60. You misinterpreted some things I guess.

They always said solid 30fps.

Talking multiplayer.

Yeah... Multiplayer.

Before Gamescom: confirmed 30fps
After Gamescom: we will target 60fps now
Today: we reach 60 fps "a lot of the time"

Seems like they are optimizing the games... so they get are getting a better performance now and upping the game specs.

I had the same problem with wrong information because the changes they did to the multiplayer is making the killzone sf story about frame rates realy confusing.

Just because of the feedback from FPS players they have tried to boost the multiplayer 30 f/s to full 60 f/s.(while the campaign remains 30/fs)

The multiplayer runs alot of time on 60 frames, we all know what happens when everyone is throwing a granade at the same spot and focus their view on it (just an example)

If a game runs 60 frames alot of time imo thads enough, atleast they tried to get full 60 f/s, just because gamers told them they want and need it.

this is where things go wrong with Sony and Microsoft, gameplay is more important than how the game look. 60fps should be the first thing to get, not 1080p. Well done Nintendo, you always go with gameplay.

I'm pretty sure they avoided multiplayer questions, including fps. Did they ever actually say it was 30?

No 1080p and 60 FPS? Rageragerageragerage!

...wait a moment... this isn't CoD or a Nintendo system?

Carry on!