Hynad said:
Because we all know that the people interested in learning about something will always be positive about those subjects. Right? |
Too true....
Hynad said:
Because we all know that the people interested in learning about something will always be positive about those subjects. Right? |
Too true....
For me i will be glad when all this speculation is over and we can just focus on what is important... buying and playing games.
I find some of the posts fascinating, I am not very strong on hardware internals to that kind of level - was always a server/software guy.
But with so much arguments going on, inaccurate posts are not going to help the situation.
Anyway, going to the Eurogamer show next week - Thursday (I think MS are doing a talk at EG on 26th)... hope there will be some interesting games around to test/compare. If anyone wants me to check out any particular games - let me know.
pbroy said:
Did you just take that literally? or is my sarcasm detector broken? In other words, go ahead and post stuff, because he won't be able to. |
No, it was being not impressed with the joke.
Sorry to give you bad news but the web are overthinking about this twitter.
"Sorry no intent to tease. I promised we'd let our architects speak about our system, and we should have something to share soon. Don't expect a bomb, but it should explain in depth our architecture and how the paper specs don't tell the full story. Again, I just spent time at TGS looking at both platforms - after E3, Gamescom, and PAX and I still insist our games look awesome."
http://www.reddit.com/r/xboxone/comments/1msxoy/according_to_albert_penello_more_xbox_one/
im still so suprised ( well not really silly sboyz ) everyone is downplaying and forgetting the possibilities with the cloud
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.
kirby007 said: im still so suprised ( well not really silly sboyz ) everyone is downplaying and forgetting the possibilities with the cloud |
Perhaps there is a reason that no one is talking about the cloud....
It's not that people are forgetting the cloud, its just that it wont make any difference to single player games/performance.
Madword said:
Perhaps there is a reason that no one is talking about the cloud.... It's not that people are forgetting the cloud, its just that it wont make any difference to single player games/performance. |
based on what?
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.
kirby007 said:
based on what? |
Based on having worked in server based systems such as Citrix/Terminal Server/datacenters/clusters.. based on the fact that systems like Gaikai etc and other current cloud based systems are good but are not fast enough for sending data down the lines... based on the internet still being crap for most people... based on 99% of games not requiring data processing ...based on games companies would need backup systems to handle what would go wrong with their games if the cloud/internet wasnt working..based on being old enough to know when companies are using poor PR to convince people. ;)
Put all of the issues with internet speeds, the time games need to process information (quicker locally), that 99% of games don't require worlds that are changing in real time.. It's just obvious that the cloud is not going to have any benefit for games, especially single player games. Will it improve matchmaking and MMO's...yep it will improve that aspect... but no more than better server tech would do that.
Madword said:
Based on having worked in server based systems such as Citrix/Terminal Server/datacenters/clusters.. based on the fact that systems like Gaikai etc and other current cloud based systems are good but are not fast enough for sending data down the lines... based on the internet still being crap for most people... based on 99% of games not requiring data processing ...based on games companies would need backup systems to handle what would go wrong with their games if the cloud/internet wasnt working..based on being old enough to know when companies are using poor PR to convince people. ;) Put all of the issues with internet speeds, the time games need to process information (quicker locally), that 99% of games don't require worlds that are changing in real time.. It's just obvious that the cloud is not going to have any benefit for games, especially single player games. Will it improve matchmaking and MMO's...yep it will improve that aspect... but no more than better server tech would do that. |
the question will be will developers cater for the % of the people that are ready for it with connection ( with as backup having 2 play modi one utilising cloud and the other not )
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.