The Vita has this problem because its selling point was console experience on a handheld. Now every critic out there has been comparing its game to them which does suck a little. But If I remember rightly alot of critics praised LBP vita and some even said it was alot better than any of the console version so sometimes it works in the vitas favor.

If this game was on XBOX it would have at least an 85 from all the 10's Microsoft magazines and sites would have given it. If anything Sony just needs more review sites on Meta critic so that they can keep up with the over inflated reviews most games receive.

Exactly, the show is another example, the show is an amazing series, and is easily the best sports game on a handheld, it is actually close to the ps3 version in everyway.  Yet the reviews are drastically different.

BS, and hate to break it to you, mercenary is as good as KZ3. Vita should never be comapred toa  dedicated hokme console, you can   play your home console on a bus. No handheld should be judged against a seperate dedicated home console period.

78% seems like a good Killzone score to me. I don't buy into the idea that you should applaud subpar elements or effort just because "hey, it's just a handheld game!". I haven't read loads of reviews but from what I have read snd the very short play time I have had, the controls are kind of assy, there are some technical issues, and the campaign is extremely short.

They did, and still gave it a lower score than the games it was so much better than, sometimes when the reviewer was the same for both games.

People aren't arguing gameplay.  They're arguing reviewers are judging the Vita's hardware shortcomings as if it should compare to a console title.

I've read reviews stating that the campaign took 6-7 hours.  That's the average for most FPS.

Controls are outstanding...................................................., there are no technical issues. Only thing you got right was yes the campaign is short, but so is every console shooter.

Its clear you didnt even read the thread. The issue isn't ignoring it's short comings. The issue is its short comings are no more or less then any console FPS, yet for some reason vita gets rated lower? Ity actually holds up very well to any console fps.

So you disagree with reviews, cool.

And 3.5-5 hours is short no matter what you wanna compare it to.

Never saw one review that said the controls were bad and I played it so I know they are not, they are the same as any FPS except the touch controls for secondary functions like switching weapons which works well.

meh, the same happens to 3DS. the west shits on handhelds.