kupomogli on 16 September 2013
| think-man said: The Vita has this problem because its selling point was console experience on a handheld. Now every critic out there has been comparing its game to them which does suck a little. But If I remember rightly alot of critics praised LBP vita and some even said it was alot better than any of the console version so sometimes it works in the vitas favor. |
They did, and still gave it a lower score than the games it was so much better than, sometimes when the reviewer was the same for both games.
| J_Allard said: 78% seems like a good Killzone score to me. I don't buy into the idea that you should applaud subpar elements or effort just because "hey, it's just a handheld game!". I haven't read loads of reviews but from what I have read snd the very short play time I have had, the controls are kind of assy, there are some technical issues, and the campaign is extremely short. |
People aren't arguing gameplay. They're arguing reviewers are judging the Vita's hardware shortcomings as if it should compare to a console title.
I've read reviews stating that the campaign took 6-7 hours. That's the average for most FPS.
