Jak 2 beinig called a bad game isn't uncommon.  It's praised by a lot of people though because it's exclusive.  If it wasn't a sequel and exclusive, more people would be honest about how shitty the game is.

Less people write reviews about games they dislike.  A fan is usually more inclined to write a review about a game they like rather than one that they dislike, so user reviews are always skewed towards more positiive.  Yet Jak 2 has 12 reviews that are 6/10 or less with a review headline that reads like it's a bad game.  http://www.gamefaqs.com/ps2/914535-jak-ii/reviews

Because a game is a game. Beautiful Katamari sold poorly and I would like a sequel (not Katamari Forever, but a proper sequel) even if it sell well or not.

The Last Guardian is a game. It deserves to be, especially when there's this arguably "small" crowd that is burning in despair until the game releases.

When I first knew about The Last Guardian in a magazine I thought it was very interesting. I think it would be a great addition to the PS4 (or PS3) library of games mainly to give it even more variety but honestly I'm indifferent about getting more info or a release date of this game.

The bird dies at the end of the game.

NOOOOOO  Spoilers

XD

ICO and Shadow of the Colossus didn't sell particularly well. Doesn't change the fact that they are some of the best PS2 games of all time.

Threads of Fate and The Bouncer were two that I found in less than 3 minutes of researching.

I didn't realize anyone wanted this game for sales reasons. I actually wanted it because the previous game from Team Ico happened to be one of the best video games I've ever played, and most lists concur.

Bouncer isn't a PSX game is it.  No, no it's not.  It's a PS2 game.  I said on the very post I replied to you that "after all the good PSX games that Square Enix developed, once the next gen came out it started releasing a lot of crappy games."  PSX has never meant "PS2" except with the DVR release of the PS2 called PSX, but no one ever references that.

Also.  Threads of Fate isn't a terrible game, which I also listed in the very post I replied to you way back.  It also didn't review badly either.  Back when all decent games weren't given a minimum of 8/10, it scored an average of 7.6 at Gamerankings as it's not listed in Metacritic.  Only two reviewers gave it below a 7, EGM and RPGamer both with a 6, while the next lowest was 7.3.  Ehrgeiz at Gamerankings reviewed a 7.5.  Tobal No. 1, the game I said was a piece of shit, because it is, has an 8.2 average over at Gamerankings.  The SaGa Frontier games which I also mentioned scored a 7 at IGN scored a 7.3 and 7.4 average at Gamerankings.  Looks like there really are no PSX titles that fit in the 7/10 and under rating that you were so sure of.  Atleast if going by averages.

I've already proved a point when I mentioned there was atleast one bad game anyways and I pointed out Tobal No. 1.  That regardless how good of a developer it is, there's no guarantee the next game is going to be good.  Why do you continue arguing the fact when you're picking out titles like the Bouncer, even when I said that's when Squaresoft started making crap, that further proves gives truth to what I said?  There's nothing to argue about when my point was already made and proven in multiple past posts.  Are you even reading half of what I post or are you skimming the first sentence and then replying, because that's what it seems like.

I know this may be hard to believe and all.................But I think I may just enjoy this even if it doesn't sell well. I know, everything must be popular for me to enjoy. Bad Jay!