Andrespetmonkey said:
SxyxS said: very dissapointing. just one city,instead of 3 different parts like in san andreas. not very big:considering the harbour in the south as size refference it seems to be smaller than san andreas(except the harbour is extremly huge) i really hope that there is another city in the north and some smaller ones all around the map. |
There isn't another city in the north, it's LA and some small towns, and the map is at least three times bigger than san andreas.
|
And that is exactly the big problem.
San Andreas was big, but you always had the motivation to cruise around as you was rewarded by a completely different city(vegas,francisco,la)
this thing is supposed to be bigger than san andreas and has nothing to offer. you have only one city.imo this is very dissapointing.
A city with just half a dozen vertical streets from west to east and the rest is mountain and trees an some valleys noone gives a shit about?-
i rellay hope that's not all what they have coded in 5 1/2years and spent 1/4 billion for.imo a bigger dissapointment than the new dmc-dante design=worser than shit.
Either they have found a way to make the exploration of the rural areas very interessting(than i'll bow down and beg for forgivness) or this will end as:play the missions and then throw the game away .
maybe i'll change my mind tommorrow but right now i'd say the game looks like it was designed by a civil searvant or maket analyst with zero sense for creativity and zero interesst in gaming(mountain in the north,lake in the middle,city in the east-omg.maybe This kind of design was impressiv in the first five days after the invention of videogames)