sniper989 said:
nice photoshop |
what is more realistic, that i saw your rating of 0.1 and mentioned it and you changed it after that or that i saw a rating of 9.1, opened photoshop to change it just to have a fake story and to talk crap?
hmmm...
sniper989 said:
nice photoshop |
what is more realistic, that i saw your rating of 0.1 and mentioned it and you changed it after that or that i saw a rating of 9.1, opened photoshop to change it just to have a fake story and to talk crap?
hmmm...
What's even more interesting is that this is on a Nsanity's thread who is banned for calling out someone. Of course, he made it personal, but it is a little ironic.
sniper989 said:
nice photoshop |
Oh c'mon and behave like a man. We all know the truth. Just tell us that you intentionally wanted to prove him wrong and you underestimated him. There is no problem to say you were wrong or that you gave a game intentionally a bad rating. Just admit everything or this will persue you until the end of time.

iceland said:
|
reported
crissindahouse said:
what is more realistic, that i saw your rating of 0.1 and mentioned it and you changed it after that or that i saw a rating of 9.1, opened photoshop to change it just to have a fake story and to talk crap? hmmm... |
photoshop seems more likely because i am unbiased and know that reach is a good game (though 4 was crap)
crissindahouse said:
sure! i would feel stupid to change that after someone mentioned it but well, everyone like he wants...
|
Ahahahahahahahaaa! Now that is complete and total ownage of a low-level idiot troll that does nothing in MS threads aside from try to derail them.
Well done, sir. Well done.
Sounds like it might be more of a gritty scifi survival game rather than scifi warfare
Im intrigued
| Talal said: I will permaban myself if the game releases in 2014. |
in reference to KH3 release date
Lulz said:
Well done, sir. Well done. |
Sadly your post isn't better in any way speaking of content and choice of words.

| walsufnir said: Sadly your post isn't better in any way speaking of content and choice of words. |
The difference is that I'm not trying to pretend that I'm not trolling. Getting caught red-handed in an obvious troll and being owned for it is deserving of being laughed at.
Oh wait, um, my account was hacked and someone else posted that. That's a more likely than me laughing at someone that tried trolling an MS thread and consequently got owned.
Really.
Although, my money is on me being banned for calling him an idiot troll (stating a fact) while he'll be allowed to roam free and continue trolling, and derailing every MS related thread he can find. That's VGC justice.
Lulz said:
The difference is that I'm not trying to pretend that I'm not trolling. Getting caught red-handed in an obvious troll and being owned for it is deserving of being laughed at. Oh wait, um, my account was hacked and someone else posted that. That's a more likely than me laughing at someone that tried trolling an MS thread and consequently got owned. Really. Although, my money is on me being banned for calling him an idiot troll (stating a fact) while he'll be allowed to roam free and continue trolling, and derailing every MS related thread he can find. That's VGC justice. |
I totally got your point but you don't have to get down to his level. There is no rule for getting banned or warned for lying but calling someone a troll is. Even if you get banned which I strongly believe nothing will change. Most probably sniper won't change his mind because I doubt he even gets what's wrong in his way and there is no consequence for him.
We have to live with this people, just ignore them. It is of no use to argue with them, most probably some are laughing at home when you try do discuss on an educated level.
