I stated from the beginning that the WiiU was supposed to be an SNES styled succesor. Nintendo messed that one up in their execution of the WiiU,its actually a very good console in design,but everything else went wrong. SNES was Nintendo's market respons to a highly competitive environment and their machine where they worked on a bunch of prototypes.
Console that expand the market take an NES type approach, then in SNES they refine it and they strengthen it. PS1-PS2 is a great example of how it works when its executed well. But Ps3 was their N64.
Nintendo has a habit of making machines in the NES/SNES style in rotation. You can see it in the handhelds, GB=expands market, Super Gameboy -Gameboy color - GBA, Solidifies the market. has great software sales- DS expands market -3DS- solidifies market. Their consoles dont follow this rythym and that is why they get knocked off course.
The WiiU was supposed to bring everything together, but nintendo miscommunicated and miss presented to the market , and they didnt have software where it should have been. Since 2010 they've been restructuring the company.
The WiiU is also very SNES like in the competition it faces. Too much in fact. So I expect N64 numbers, because that's what nintendo needs to do to solidify their standing. Which is what the SNES did. Which they fucked over with the N64 and then further with GCN.
I've never agreed with John Lucas since I entered this thread.
You clearly dont read very well. Go ask him. Or you know. Read my earlier posts.
The WiiU has too much competition and the other consoles arent going to die that quickly this gen.
Mobile gaming will be dead in 3 years though. You can count on that. The market is just going to collapse. Then come the licensing fees and the bottom will fall out for anyone not named Candy Crush and Puzzles & Dragons
http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2014/01/20/nintendos-woes-dont-mean-game-over-for-its-consoles/