None of this makes any sense. There was no GTA presence on Xbox until GTA was on XBox. There was no Final Fantasy presence on XBox until FF went there (or PlayStation for that matter). Those games did fine. If GTA5 was on Wii U it would sell way over 200k and make money and possibly convert a few new fans. I see no reason not to do it. It's a good game, Wii U owners would buy it.

How do you know 200k will make it a profitable venture? I hear this sort of statement a lot on here, ninty fans demanding games get ported to Wii U regardless of historic sales or apparent gamer demographics, with the justification that a port should be cheap and therefore profitable with low sales. But I never see any evidence to back that up. Re-designing your game engine to run on a very different architecture isn't easy, you don't just press the 'compile to Wii-U' button and start burning the disks. Massive games like GTA takes years of beta testing and QA as well, which they'd have to redo for a new engine.

The original Xbox got GTA because the PC got GTA 3 (the PC was the lead platform for GTA 1 and 2, with PS1 getting ports) and the Xbox was a PC. GTA 3 first came to PS2 because Sony paid for the timed exclusivity. 360 got FF because at the time the PS3 wasn't going well and didn't look able to support SE's 5 million sales target that they were banking on to make the game profitable. 

There is nothing stopping Nintendo paying money to Rockstar to ensure a Wii-U port happens. Rockstar are a business, they'd do anything if the risk is worth the reward, and if Nintendo take some of that risk by co-funding a port then Rockstar would likely make one (like they did with GTA3 for PS2). To date that hasn't happened, but if Nintendo wants these type of games then they'll probably need to, especially when their install-base is so low. And before you say 'but ps4 and xbone's install base is 0', the ps4 and xbone 1) are the natural sucessors to the consoles that have supported the previous games (so lower risk) and 2) are basically suped up PC's (which lowers porting costs, though I'd still say they'd be looking for sales far higher than 200k, which is likely given point 1).

Its not some conspiracy, its just business. The question is why isn't Ninty buying 3rd party support like MS did in the early days of 360 when they raked in billions in profits with the Wii? What are they doing with that money? It doesn't seem like they spend it on more dev teams, so what is it being used for?

Xbox already had games that appealed to the GTA demo.

I wasn't talking about userbase size, I doubt you would have got a much better reaction from Nintendo fans on the Wii's 100 mill userbase. It's not up to third parties to build WiiU's userbase, remotely.

None of those games did ok and your reasoning is so poor "EA kicked Nintendo fans in the guy" dude the majority don't even know what EA is. It's all excuses as always.

Such as...?

Rockstar never had a presence on nintendo consoles, why should they bother with the WiiU now? GTA fans are spread between the PS3, Xbox 360 and a bit for the PC. their other games like RDR, L.A noire, and max payne all skipped nintendo consoles. my point is, they do NOT have a fanbase on nintendo consoles. yes china town wars sold 1.2M but thats on a console that sold 150+ and everybody had it, the game had a 93 metacritic, so it isnt the games fault. other than that game GTA has never been on a nintendo console. then look at the CoD sales on the WiiU, a very low 190K. thats CoD and thats a franchise that HAD a fanbase on nintendo consoles before which sold between 1.4-1.8 million. then on the WiiU it performed 190K. If CoD sold that bad why wouldnt GTA? specially when it doesnt have a fanbase on the console. 

add to that is that Nintendo is a brand that is family friendly, whether nintendo likes it or not it is. a huge chunk of its sales comes from parents buying it for their kids, that audince simply isnt interested in games like GTA. and probably the most important factor is that porting a game with the scale of GTA wont be easy and cheap. this game is HUGE. the maps is extremely huge. the content is unbelievably high and rockstar have their standards. porting everything to the WiiU wont be easy, wont be cheap and wont be fast. it will take tons of resources and time to do it and all for what? a few hundered thousand? their fanbase is already on the PS360, why bother?  ohh and it doesnt help that the WiiU sales are beyond horrible at this point (i just remembered to add this right before pressing post)

so to sum it up

1- rockstar never had a presence on nintendo consoles

2- all their fans already have atleast one of the two consoles, except maybe the few PC fans

3- Even though CoD had its fan base and fans on the Wii the WiiU version of CoD only sold 190K

4- A lot of WiiU owners are kids who are interested in games like mario and mario kart, games that are generally targeted towards kids. kids who arent interested in games like GTA

5- lengthy and costly porting of the game that simply wont be worth it, specially considering how big GTA5 is

6- extremely bad WiiU sales.

so yes, mainly due to those reasons i think porting GTA5 to WiiU would be an extremely stupid idea that simply wont have any benifit towards rockstar what so ever

It absolutely is up to them to grow their franchises on all mediums possible if they want to increase budgets to make a profit. 

Do you think the playsation would still be around if it wasn't for 3rd party support? The fact is 3rd parties hellped the userbase grown on plastation as it did on xbox this gen.

To call Nintendo fans stupid for not knowing what EA is is ignorant at best as the core woudl be adults that have disposable income and own multiple consoles.