I still kind of like the packers against the Steelers even without Rodgers.
Preseason voting: Who will win the Super Bowl? | |||
| Ravens | 28 | 6.14% | |
| Patriots | 53 | 11.62% | |
| Broncos | 141 | 30.92% | |
| Texans | 9 | 1.97% | |
| Other (AFC) | 19 | 4.17% | |
| 49ers | 32 | 7.02% | |
| Falcons | 5 | 1.10% | |
| Packers | 17 | 3.73% | |
| Seahawks | 101 | 22.15% | |
| Other (NFC) | 47 | 10.31% | |
| Total: | 452 | ||
I still kind of like the packers against the Steelers even without Rodgers.
RolStoppable said:
It's okay. There aren't any bans planned for this week, so you can say what you really think. |
Lol, the Packers.
| RolStoppable said: Yeah, sponsored by the tobacco industry. |
Yeah that part was funny and disturbing at the same time.
But the general idea that players in many cases retire too early is a good one.
RolStoppable said:
|
I'm in Iran right now. Missed last weeks picks cause I was having a shitty travel experience plus I had to get around this countries stupid filters to get onto vgchartz.
The definitive evidence that video games turn people into mass murderers
Mendicate Bias said:
I'm in Iran right now. Missed last weeks picks cause I was having a shitty travel experience plus I had to get around this countries stupid filters to get onto vgchartz. |
Iran that does not sound like a fun place to be at all even in an airport. New England versus Baltimore should be an exciting game. I really do not know which team to root for. Good luck.

| RolStoppable said: I am aware of that, but Flynn is 2-1 as a starter, plus a tie after a 16 point deficit. There's also Lacy, plus the fact that the guys on NFL.com say that the Steelers defense is so old that soon they will go on the field in wheelchairs. |
His 2-1-1 record comes against the Vikings, Cowboys, Lions and Falcons. Two of those teams are (somehow) at .500, while the other two aren't even close to sniffing a winning season. I'm glad he put up narrow wins against two of them, don't get me wrong, but I just have almost no faith in Flynn as a regular starter. If we win with him, it'll be because we have him be a game manager* and rely more on our run game. And I think the second-half Steelers are a cut above these four teams, albeit not by much.
Obviously I'm rooting for the Packers, but I'd put odds against them, 60-40.
*I don't mean that in the derogatory sense.
| superchunk said: Even if he doesn't play, PIT has been the pitts. GB at home still has the win in this one. |
They haven't been that bad recently.
| superchunk said: Pushover? I'm going with the best option considering Cutler is 50/50, Briggs is still considered out meaning our defense is still meh and Philly has been doing very well with Foles (GO AZ CATS ALUMNI!) and just came off of a bad loss they'll want to win big Sunday. |
Hey don't tell me, tell amp. Just the messenger here.
I wonder if the Packers fans are even interested in football if the Packers miss the playoffs?
Also, I hope the Eagles and bears tie as I am rooting for both teams to make the playoffs.

RolStoppable said:
|
NobleTeam360 said:
|
Changing a couple of my picks. Switched MIA-BUF to 1 and DAL-WAS to 1.
| MIA-BUF | 1 | NO-CAR | 2 | MIN-CIN | 2 | DEN-HOU | 1 |
| TEN-JAC | 1 | IND-KC | 2 | DAL-WAS | 1 | CLE-NYJ | 2 |
| TB-STL | 2 | ARI-SEA | 2 | NYG-DET | 2 | NE-BAL | 2 |
| OAK-SD | 2 | PIT-GB | 2 | CHI-PHI | 2 | ATL-SF | 2 by 12 |