| RolStoppable said: I am aware of that, but Flynn is 2-1 as a starter, plus a tie after a 16 point deficit. There's also Lacy, plus the fact that the guys on NFL.com say that the Steelers defense is so old that soon they will go on the field in wheelchairs. |
His 2-1-1 record comes against the Vikings, Cowboys, Lions and Falcons. Two of those teams are (somehow) at .500, while the other two aren't even close to sniffing a winning season. I'm glad he put up narrow wins against two of them, don't get me wrong, but I just have almost no faith in Flynn as a regular starter. If we win with him, it'll be because we have him be a game manager* and rely more on our run game. And I think the second-half Steelers are a cut above these four teams, albeit not by much.
Obviously I'm rooting for the Packers, but I'd put odds against them, 60-40.
*I don't mean that in the derogatory sense.
| superchunk said: Even if he doesn't play, PIT has been the pitts. GB at home still has the win in this one. |
They haven't been that bad recently.
| superchunk said: Pushover? I'm going with the best option considering Cutler is 50/50, Briggs is still considered out meaning our defense is still meh and Philly has been doing very well with Foles (GO AZ CATS ALUMNI!) and just came off of a bad loss they'll want to win big Sunday. |
Hey don't tell me, tell amp. Just the messenger here.
