NintendoPie said:
oniyide said:
im kinda disagreeing that they were as bad as you say. the truth is most of those games were as good as they were going to get, its not devs fault that the machine they had to port to was so far behind the HDs. I would argue the WIi itself just wasnt enough, but i know thats not the answer people want to hear.
|
It's not the answer most people want to hear because it's simply wrong.
Developers could make great games on the Wii. They could even make alright ports. The reason they didn't wansn't because of the Wii's specs, it was because they were lazy. They could make a quick buck off of a crappy port, so they did.
Nintendo made great games, and some smaller developers made great games. Why couldn't big developers with a lot of money do the same?
|
it isnt wrong, the games that Ninty made wasnt really pushing the boundaries of the system itself, be real here do you think Ninty's best efforts, were as tech heavy as say GTAs, Just Cause, Fallout, Skyrim, Killzone, Mass Effect, Uncharted, Last of US, Halo, Assassins Creed, Force Unleased. I can go on and on, but nothing on Wii even came close to those games including the Ninty efforts. ANd lets be clear im not talking whether the games were good or better. Im speaking strictly subjectivly tech heavy games. You dont really believe that those games i mentioned would run on WIi without HEAVY cutting to the point where it would either suck and miss the point or simply have to be a different game altogether.