pezus said:
Adinnieken said:
That top image was never a UI on the Xbox 360. It looks like either an attempt at sarcasm regarding ads, or someone's design proposal. But it never looked like that.
Yes, the Volt advertisement is clearly an Ad. It says so.
|
Then you hopefully get the point:
http://www.technobuffalo.com/2012/04/25/xbox-360-to-see-tv-like-advertisements/

It's quite clear that there's a space for ads there. Ads that have nothing to do with the content of Live.
|
It's better than it was under the NXE. Under the NXE you could end up with more than one ad under a channel. I personally don't have a problem with the ads however. Some I click on, some I don't. There is this amazing ability I have, the ability to ignore things that aren't important to me and most importantly to notice the things that are important to me.
Where do I post most often? In threads about hardware and systems. Where do I post least often? In threads about games. I ignore a lot of content here on VGChartz, only to post in a few threads per day. It's an amazing ability of focus.
I personally never have understood the outcry over the ads. Especially when you consider, if you subscribe to a TV service, what do you get? Ads encouraging you to subscribe to the services you already have, for a price you can't take advantage of, because you're already a customer! Had they been content ads, which the majority of Microsoft's are, and not services ads or worse 4 minute third-party ads, I'd have less of a problem with TV providers. I don't even mind the ads on Hulu.
Ads can be both informative and entertaining, and if you understand the psychology behind advertising they can also be interesting. The problem aren't ads. The problem is how overwhelming they can be. For instance, if TV advertising was limited to one 60 second or two 30 second advertisements, I don't think anyone would complain about ads. If you bumped it up to 120 seconds total with two 60 second or up to four 30 second ads, I still don't think the majority of people would mind. But it's when they went to four or five minutes worth of advertising that things kind of went off the rocker. A 60 minute program in the US on average has about 18 minutes of commercials. A 30 minute program 7 minutes. That's 30% and 23% of the viewing time, respectively.
So, am I troubled by an ad that does nothing unless I highlight or select it? No. Not at all, because I have the outrageously superhuman power to ignore it.
The question is however, now that Sony is charging users to pay to play multiplayer games, will gamers be upset too that they're forced to have advertisements? Or now that Sony is charging for PSN and displaying advertisements, is it ok?
I'm curious of how hypocritical Playstation gamers actually are, and I think it's a fair thing to be curious of. There were a lot of Playstation gamers that voiced their opinion about Xbox LIVE's subscription service and advertisements. Now that Sony is following suit with PSN and shoe-horning multiplayer gaming into PS+ I wonder now if those who cried out that Microsoft was committing an atrocity by featuring ads on their service, will feel the same way about Sony with PSN?