Jazz2K said:
I think reviews should be re-evaluated later on. Like a review on launch day and a final verdict a month later. It could also put the game to a better light like for instance, someone buying Drive Club at launch versus someone buying it 2 months later. He goes for the review, it says servers are down and no weather system but this isn't true two months later. Maybe not doing a complete review of the game but adjustments should be considered. |
yeah, sites could do that sometimes also with games which get some free add-ons or stuff (which doesn't happen very often but as example with racing games like GT or Forza, both franchises get only better after time and especially GT5 and Forza 5)
When MCC is in half a year a totally different experience as today it's pretty weird to have still the same score from that site since it should be a help for the customer in half a year then and he doesn't have anything from reading about stuff which won't be true when he reads it.
It's obviously not so easy to do that especially for smaller sites but at least those games which have some launch issues which get resolved sooner than later should be tried when these issues are solved to give it a second thought.
When magazines review a car and it doesn't have enough power (just as example) and they put a new motor in it after a year thee magazines will also check it a second time and how the car feels then.
