Correct. never said otherwise. Just a fair picture, that works both ways, showing what one can do that the other can't. Its not about exclusives, but differentiating libraries.Door swings both ways, PS benefits as well.

TWELVE PAGES discussing one of the most stupid things I ever saw.

Let me solve this for you: if a friend asks "should I get a 360 or a PS3?", here's what you answer: "both libraries are pretty much the same, but do you prefer Uncharted, God of War and Gran Turismo or Gears of War, Halo and Forza?"

Wasn't that simple fellas? Sweet god...

On a sidenote, sales seems to live in a world where PS fans are evil bastards who need to be fought and defeated in a bizarre war. I digress.

I see what you did there.

Well played. Still an extremely pointless argument though.

Like one guy said: Let's just compare the available games on one vs the available games on the other. Don't assume somebody has additional hardware that you may or may not have. When it's one on one, we should just compare what's AVAILABLE.

I'm refraining from using the "E" word.

E-Penis! Whoops. It slipped.

exclusive vs exclusive is simple too, but the difference is that it filters out current gen/recent releases, as opposed to filtering out games that aren't from the current generation.

I guess "time" would be the main reason, but again, its my own personal view to not count past gen games. What I do think should be universal, its expanding beyond typical exclusive lists when comparing the merits of 2 consoles.

Agreed. But again I am a advocate for doing lists that go beyond merely comparing exclusives. These multiplats on one and not the other deserve to be mentioned.

Nope. But they aren't on Xbox. And thus they deserve to be mentioned as such.

Playstation has better games without the need to rely on PC titles. 

I replied to you before that you're missing out on a lot of games by not playing games on PC and you stated that "you're basically saying your console doesn't have enough content to keep you interested."  It's less the PS3 or even the 360 if I was an owner doesn't have good games, but more than I'm missing out on a lot of great games by not owning a PC.

Because I'm a PC owner, I can play those 360 "exclusive games" like Torchlight, Limbo, Left 4 Dead, Bastion, Minecraft, Alan Wake, etc.  By not being a PC owner, I can't play new games like Torchlight 2,  Legend of Grimrock, Rome 2, etc, older games like, XCOM UFO Defense, Might and Magic, Heroes of Might and Magic, Syndicate, Baldur's Gate, etc.

I can go and say the same thing to you that you need a Wii and a Wii U to satisfy your gaming needs because your 360 doesn't have enough good games. By using your logic, purchasing a competitors console is far worse than playing games on the PC, because unlike a competitors console, I use my PC for more than just playing games.  Hell.  The least of what I do on my PC is playing games, and the only time i ever buy PC games is when I can get them dirt cheap.  I actually just got Torchlight 2 for $3.75.  Because there's so much great content on the PS3, I can wait for prices on PC to go on sale for ridiculously prices before purchasing.

Not just PC though.  I shouldn't collect for the Vita or the PSP right?  Since the PS3 should be enough.  So you're technically right.  I have Wii, DS, 3DS, PSP, Vita, and PS3 games this gen, as well as PC games.  I have many games spanning multiiple generations whether they're NES games, Genesis games, etc.  I should be content with my library of around 100 PS3 games.   

Nono its not like im saying it isn't available somewhere else. We acknowledge the other versions. But when making a strict 1 vs 1 comparison, its fair to show what sets them apart individually, regardless of other platforms that fall outside said specific comparison.

I agree entirely. Though I prefer the PS3 as a platform, it's no good having a PS3 if you want to play a game that isn't on PS3. No matter how good the other stuff may be, if it doesn't appeal to you, it's not going to sway you!

Vita has no games (according to a lot of non real gaming haters) because they can all be played somewhere else just about, not all on the same platforms (it's kind of getting a good selection of PC Indie, there are now also some good iOS ports coming across, as well as PS2/PS3 ports. and it has the USP of being the only place you can play all of them with physical controls comfortably arranged onto the unit and on the go.)

But yes, a great game is a great game regardless of how many/few formats it came out on. Good thread!