My one issue with the "exclusives" argument

[sales2099]

CGI-Quality said:

sales2099 said:

kitler53 said:

so in short..

..no matter what set of stupid rules you decide to use: ps3 >> 360.  whether you want to compare true exclusives or just consolve exclusives there simply is no comparing the two.  ps3 has a massive amount of additional support.

hmm,. maybe if we change the rules yet again to included timed exclusives...   you know, because 360 has bioshock and ps3 doesn't didn't!

"stupid"....sigh.  Its actually very progressive. It paints a clear picture on what one can do and one cant. PS has multiplats too that arent on Xbox. 

Meaning they're still multiplatform

Correct. never said otherwise. Just a fair picture, that works both ways, showing what one can do that the other can't. Its not about exclusives, but differentiating libraries.Door swings both ways, PS benefits as well.