I also left off a bunch of MS new IP.  You must admit, that even without announcing a tonne of their games yet, MS's new IP line-up looks VERY STRONG against Sony's.

I wonder how this list is biased, given it is based entirely off a PS3 fanboy's thread and an independent statistics-gathering site.

 Since they each average well over 90% based on gamerankings.  Ironically, the last NG installement on Xbox averaged 5% higher than the last GT installment on PS2.  Would you say GT is not AAA?

Would you please explain to me how the PS3 currently has the RPG or racer games over the 360? Or the platformers over the Wii?

Most recent speculation indicates that whilst the graphics of Killzone 2 will be excellent, the gameplay will be mediocre, just like the first one.  In any case, the track record justisn't there for this game. 

 If you had taken one moment to properly read the OP, you would have realised I fully acknowledge that MGS and FF have better marketing value, and are therefore better system sellers than most 360 games.  But based on the fact that I merely regurgitated the DOCUMENTED history of each console's major franchises, I don't know why people are calling me biased.  Im merely defending the QUALITY of the Xbox 360's linup against all the PS Fanboys that are going ZOMG DA PS3 HAS DA FF AND DA MGS AND ITS GONNA WIPE DA FLAW WITH DA XBOTS!!!!

Ok this is getting old.  Does anyone want to just explain to me what in my OP is wrong?  makingmusic's console comparison expanded on mine, but also largely agreed with everything I originally said.  My OP said NOTHING about sales, it only compares PAST quality.  Im sick of everything based in fact that suggests the PS3's lineup is anything less than godly or that the other consoles linups are anything more than shit being shotdown by asses like this guy.

You have to admit, there was some bias. You listed 360 games that haven't even been announced yet as if they were guaranteed for 2008, then put "probably won't be out until 2009" next to ps3 games that we already know a good bit about, one of which even has a demo.

And my comparison didn't quite agree with yours, as removing Gears 2 and Forza 3 really weakens the 360's lineup, as far as guaranteed successes go.

As for new IPs, both consoles have a plethora of titles hitting this year, so you can't exactly say one side has a better line up than the other. Especially with so many release dates up in the air (will Valkyrie of the Battlefield or Alan Wake make it out this year?), and the possibilities of more Lairs (Free Radical have a great track record, but Haze looks meh).

In the end, let's just say you were a tad overly optomistic for the 360. ^^

While I agree with the sentiment behind this thread. Making comparisons at this time is premature as is being overly optimistic. Given the track record of game delivery on the PS3. You really need to take a more cautious approach. Further more given what happened last year with the PS3 duds you would think a few posters might have learned a valuable lesson. Don't count your chickens before they hatch. Finally we are still in the dark about where Microsoft is going this year. You can't make a strong case with half the evidence missing from the docket. Sony might have some surprises as well.

Everyone is getting ahead of themselves. Lets content ourselves with the outlook for the next couple months until we get a real picture of what will be on our plates throughout the end of the year. Everyone was getting ahead of themselves a few weeks ago. I would at least like to see some of these games not only announced, but I would like to at the very least see their tentative release dates, and perhaps some preliminary reviews.

There is a huge difference between AAA games and system sellers.
AAA games are very nice indeed if you own that platform but don't have much effect on the overall scheme of things.
System sellers are what win the console war.

Now the best system sellers are the established brands, it is rare for a new IP to be a system seller (yes I know, Halo).
The PS3 appears at this stage to have a huge advantage over the 360 this year with proven system sellers.
However:
1) The jury is out on how good a lot of these games actually are.
2) Microsoft have something up their sleeve.
3) GTA IV exclusive content gives 360 a big advantage. This will be the biggest gaming event of the year.
4) It depends a lot on how good the marketing is. Sony marketing seems to be less than it once was. Microsoft marketing gets better and better.
5) Every year there are the suprise titles that come from nowhere and wow the market. 2008 will be no different.
6) We are still getting a lot of product delays in this generation. Most studios are still saying that PS3 is a bitch to develop for.

Can we please stop calling every game AAA if it has a remote chance of being good.

There are maybe 10 AAA series.

Mario, Zelda, Final Fantasy, Halo, Gran Turismo, Grand Theft Auto, Pokemon

And maybe Metal Gear Solid and Resident Evil

So Nintendo 3, Sony 4, Microsoft 3
Sony still has most AAA titles, but has to share 2 with Microsoft now.

 Every indication we have is that GeoW 2 WILL be out this year and that FF and GT wont be.  And though I need to check, i'm pretty sure i put F3 as probably not making 2008.  If i havent i will change it.

I mean there are people in this thread telling me that there is no doubt Killzone will be AAA as it has a high budget (despite the pathetic (compared to AAA titles) original) and im being accussed of bias?

And honestly.  Do you really think that Sony's new IP lineup looks as promising as MS's.  Though at the same time, I do concede that that was the subjective part of my post.  Ill add in an IMO!