This shit gets kind of old. Bad reporting at it's best.

He never mentions Wii U by name. He never verbally lumps in Wii U with the PS3 and 360. You people are the ones doing that footwork for yourself. Powerwise the Wii U, despite what many fanboys go to painstaking ends to claim, is substantially more powerful, in it's full potential, than either of those last/current gen consoles. The Wii U is "next gen", and people saying otherwise is honestly getting kind of childish. The man never once stated "Wii U is not getting this game". So until he says that exactly, there is no proof.

Hell, there's no proof this game will ever even come out, for that matter.

Like I said in my previous post, it's a very large assumption people are making based not on the facts, but on speculation that tech geeks on the internet, most of which have a hard-on against Nintendo consoles, have made.

The facts are that Wii U, while having an underclocked CPU, has a perfectly fine GPU, and substantially more RAM than the PS3 or 360. That last bit right there is the most important element. The gap between Wii U and PS4 power is significantly smaller this gen than it was between Wii and PS3. That is a fact. With Wii U it's a matter of scalability, whereas with Wii it was often a matter of companies just not wanting to build a wholly different version for Wii. That will not have to be the case nearly as much, if at all, with Wii U. For all this talk about how "weak" and "last gen" Wii U's tech is, honestly, it's a bunch of bullshit.

The system could stand to be more powerful, sure. But it's also powerful enough to keep up.

*facepalm*

At no point in the original interview -- in the entire article, as a matter of fact -- is the Wii U even mentioned. What a load of hogwash.