By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Least fav developers?

ktay95 on 01 July 2013
Nem said:
Dgc1808 said:
KingdomHeartsFan said:

For all you guys saying EA, the title says least favorite developer, not publisher.  Mine would probably be Square Enix, making us wait so long for KH3, the current batch of terrible Final Fantasy games and they didn't make a sequel to the World Ends With You, even with the great scores.


SE is also a pubslisher and not a developer.


Square-enix has internal development teams, so they are deveopers aswell.

but which specific team do they mean, its like all the people stating EA but not the specific development team.



Around the Network
Nem on 01 July 2013
ktay95 said:

but which specific team do they mean, its like all the people stating EA but not the specific development team.


Its not like they let us know wich team does what. We just know that theres an FFXIII team, a Kingdo hearts team and an FFXIVAAR team. Then theres supposed to be another part of the Kingdom hearts team wich is doing FFXV.

Still, his point was valid. Most squeenix teams make us wait a long time for their games.



Th3PANO on 01 July 2013

Lionhead Studios. Promises after promises(ok, Molyneux was a big reason for that). Fable 1 was great. had charme and a somewhat enjoyable story.
Fable 2. Still good but some hints that the franchise will only go down from here.
Fable 3.....................dafuq?
The Journey - The guy who had this idea gets still beaten up in a basement somewhere in russia (don't know if it was Molyneux)



Xen on 01 July 2013
Dgc1808 said:
KingdomHeartsFan said:

For all you guys saying EA, the title says least favorite developer, not publisher.  Mine would probably be Square Enix, making us wait so long for KH3, the current batch of terrible Final Fantasy games and they didn't make a sequel to the World Ends With You, even with the great scores.


SE is also a pubslisher and not a developer.

They are very much a developer..



gergroy on 01 July 2013

Probably polyphony digital and turn 10 because I can not stand their games. I just do not get the appeal.



Around the Network
sniper989 on 01 July 2013

343i

loved Halo: Reach, couldn't stand Halo 4

just my opinion though, seen many people say the opposite



KungKras on 01 July 2013

LJN



I LOVE ICELAND!

F0X on 01 July 2013

If any developer is to represent a truly internal EA team, it would be Visceral Games, which is located on the site of EA's headquarters.

As for Square-Enix, many of their published games are listed as being developed by them. This is called "self-publishing", and it doesn't preclude anyone from being classified as a developer. :/



3DS Friend Code: 0645 - 5827 - 5788
WayForward Kickstarter is best kickstarter: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1236620800/shantae-half-genie-hero

chapset on 01 July 2013
MDMAlliance said:
chapset said:

.... I'm not talking about making the same game they been making since 98 in 3d I mean a real console rpg like skyrim but with pokemons and a huge world


It doesn't really matter.  Your points didn't really make much sense anyway.  Nintendo doesn't keep releasing the same stuff.  The games that they release that is the same over and over is the stuff that sells really well (because that's what the consumers want from those games).  
Talk about contradiction
However, there are plenty of games where they changed a lot and even have new IPs.  It's ridiculous to assume that Nintendo (actually Game Freak) is being lazy with current pokemon games.  If you were actually working with the team that makes the games, you would know better than to say it's lazy.

Really pokemon is the epitome of rehash, adding a bike and running shoes is enough for a new gen

Game Freak (not really Nintendo) has its reasons for not making pokemon into that kind of game.  Pokemon games already sells 10mil no problem.  

having pokemon selling 15mill on handheald and 10mill on console would be good for Nintendo don't you agree





Bet reminder: I bet with Tboned51 that Splatoon won't reach the 1 million shipped mark by the end of 2015. I win if he loses and I lose if I lost.

Daisuke72 on 01 July 2013
chapset said:
MDMAlliance said:
chapset said:

.... I'm not talking about making the same game they been making since 98 in 3d I mean a real console rpg like skyrim but with pokemons and a huge world


It doesn't really matter.  Your points didn't really make much sense anyway.  Nintendo doesn't keep releasing the same stuff.  The games that they release that is the same over and over is the stuff that sells really well (because that's what the consumers want from those games).  
Talk about contradiction
However, there are plenty of games where they changed a lot and even have new IPs.  It's ridiculous to assume that Nintendo (actually Game Freak) is being lazy with current pokemon games.  If you were actually working with the team that makes the games, you would know better than to say it's lazy.

Really pokemon is the epitome of rehash, adding a bike and running shoes is enough for a new gen

Game Freak (not really Nintendo) has its reasons for not making pokemon into that kind of game.  Pokemon games already sells 10mil no problem.  

having pokemon selling 15mill on handheald and 10mill on console would be good for Nintendo don't you agree



i agree Pokemon Firered and Diamond were so dissapointing because the lack of newly added features. A console pokemon game would be a HUGE system seller.