By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Titanfall may come to PS4 after all

oniyide said:
Adinnieken said:
DirtyP2002 said:

Playstation fans want this game so bad. It is hilarious.
Wait for spring 2015 and you can play it... probably.

Moderated,

-Mr Khan

Who ever reported DirtyP2002 for this post honestly needs to grow up.

There is nothiing wrong with his observation nor with his conclusion.  He/she isn't flaming anyone nor are they trolling anyone. 

What conclusion should one arrive at when on one hand you have Sony enthusiasts saying it's a crappy game when it's initially announced as an Xbox Exclusive, then turning around and be excited for it coming to the PS4?  It would seem highly logical under those circumstances that Sony enthusiasts want this game in that case.  It likewise, for some would be funny that such a contradiction exists where the game when it's an Xbox One, Xbox 360, PC exclusive isn't a great game, but when the possibility exists that it is coming to the PS4, then it's a great game.  How would one perceive that irony otherwise?  Seriously???

And yes, 2015 would likely be the release date as it doesn't appear that the Xbox One, Xbox 360, or PC release date will be before 2014.  So what is so how is the educated, logical, assumption that 2015 would be a reasonable timeframe to be able to play the game on the PS4 upsetting to anyone??? 

Are we to the point where astute obervation and an educated, logical assumption is a bannable offense on this site? 

The conclusion is wrong, its simple as that. Unless you want to ignore people who STILL dont give a crap about the game. Multiplat or not (present company included). You cant just say all Sony fans want the game to come, that is simply wrong

How was that offensive. Sometimes this is worse then the fucking stasi. I mean he even said you should wait. baning somebody for this is just wrong, and will keep new members away. 



Around the Network
oniyide said:

well he/she didnt say "some" so that implies he/she is talking about everyone. Especially considering said person's posting histroy, which is probably why he/she got modded in the first place.

and FYI i didnt report anything.

He/she didn't need to. 

Is it absolutely necessary that we define to perfection exactly what we are speaking about?  Can we not make reasonable generalizations without being offended?

The problem isn't what HE/SHE said, it's what YOU are reading into it! 

There is NOTHING ban worthy in what DirtyP said, and the fact that a moderator banned someone for saying it is offensive.  I can live with someone being immature and feeling they were offended by nothing, but the moderators are supposed to rise above that.  They're supposed to be a moderating force within the community NOT complicit in its offenses.

And again, YOU are reading in to what is being said.  I never said you reported anything and I never accused you of doing so.  Did I?



Adinnieken said:
oniyide said:

well he/she didnt say "some" so that implies he/she is talking about everyone. Especially considering said person's posting histroy, which is probably why he/she got modded in the first place.

and FYI i didnt report anything.

He/she didn't need to. 

Is it absolutely necessary that we define to perfection exactly what we are speaking about?  Can we not make reasonable generalizations without being offended?

The problem isn't what HE/SHE said, it's what YOU are reading into it! 

There is NOTHING ban worthy in what DirtyP said, and the fact that a moderator banned someone for saying it is offensive.  I can live with someone being immature and feeling they were offended by nothing, but the moderators are supposed to rise above that.  They're supposed to be a moderating force within the community NOT complicit in its offenses.

And again, YOU are reading in to what is being said.  I never said you reported anything and I never accused you of doing so.  Did I?

if you want to speak to people? yeah it is. 

Maybe you've havent been a member long enough. But i have and I know that DirtyP was stealth trolling, the MODS know it was a stealth troll which is why he/she was banned. Im not offended at all, i could care less. I was just commenting on why he/she was banned and if you dont like it take it up with the mod that banned him.



since when are generalizations reasonable?

While I think the statement in question does inherently imply "all" as "PS fans" would be an all inclusive usage of that term.

If I said "VGcharters like corn" then I am saying "all VGcharters like corn" not "some" or "few" or "only those that like corn amongst the VGcharters like corn"
You can't go into a crowded room and say "hey you in the blue shirt" and not expect everyone wearing a blue shirt to turn around.

So tell me then if he was not referring to "all ps fans" what "ps fans" was he singling out? those that are interested in titan fall? wouldn't that be a bit redundant?

That being said I didn't find what was said offensive... it was a gross misconception at worst, but still nothing to be offended over... "OMG HOW DARE YOU IMPLY I MIGHT LIKE A GAME!"

I doubt he was banned because it was found offensive, but rather the generalization of a fan base



Talal said:
I will permaban myself if the game releases in 2014.

in reference to KH3 release date

What ive seen (very little) of both Destiny and Titanfall, i have to admit that Destiny looks the more interesting.

Titanfall looks (could be wrong as i didnt see that much of it)... as a COD with Mechs. While Destiny feels/looks more like Fallout in space. While Destiny also feels like an MMO but with the ability to go off and do single player things, while as i said TF looks just like some battle maps.

Anyone know what the story is with Titanfall? i.e whats the aim of the game/scope of it.



Making an indie game : Dead of Day!

Around the Network
Madword said:
What ive seen (very little) of both Destiny and Titanfall, i have to admit that Destiny looks the more interesting.

Titanfall looks (could be wrong as i didnt see that much of it)... as a COD with Mechs. While Destiny feels/looks more like Fallout in space. While Destiny also feels like an MMO but with the ability to go off and do single player things, while as i said TF looks just like some battle maps.

Anyone know what the story is with Titanfall? i.e whats the aim of the game/scope of it.

It would be interesting if they did add some persistent world thing like MAG



Talal said:
I will permaban myself if the game releases in 2014.

in reference to KH3 release date

oniyide said:
Mr Puggsly said:
J_Allard said:
DC Universe didn't "do well" because it was an average MMO.

MAG didn't do well because it was a below average title that tried to live on a gimmick 256 player feature.

If Titanfall is half as good as CoD 1-4 were, it will sell great. If they put "from the makers of CoD" on the box it's going to add tons of sales.

Right, people are just using mediocre games as an example of how online only games do on consoles.

Destiny and Titanfall might be the first great console games that are online only.

quality is subjective for 1,  and for 2 hwo about you name some games that were online only on consoles and sold good?

Can you name an online only console shooter that was any good? I mean, guys can throw out games like MAG or SOCOM Confrontation as evidence, but did those games not sell all that great because they were online only, or did they not sell all that great because the games themselves were not all that great? How well do you think games as good as Battlefield or CoD would sell with no SP component? My guess would still be in the millions.

And LOL @ that Xbox list. Yikes. People talked as if MAG sold like trash, so he correctly reminded us that MAG outsold most other Sony games. No need to be so defensive :)



Only about half of the people finish the single player campaign in Call of Duty games. So they do sell 25 million a year on the strength of multiplayer. Yes this for all of those writing off the game because it is multiplayer only.

http://www.vg247.com/2013/06/21/titanfall-doesnt-contain-single-player-because-only-a-small-percentage-will-finish-it/

http://www.gamezone.com/news/2011/11/03/only-18-6-of-players-have-completed-cod-black-ops-single-player-campaign

How many of you know it all people would spend 60-70% of your resources on single player when you know only 1 in 5 people will bother with them?



We already knew this. It's coming on Xbox one first. That much I know and I will get it day one.



AndrewWK said:
oniyide said:
Adinnieken said:
DirtyP2002 said:

Playstation fans want this game so bad. It is hilarious.
Wait for spring 2015 and you can play it... probably.

Moderated,

-Mr Khan

Who ever reported DirtyP2002 for this post honestly needs to grow up.

There is nothiing wrong with his observation nor with his conclusion.  He/she isn't flaming anyone nor are they trolling anyone. 

What conclusion should one arrive at when on one hand you have Sony enthusiasts saying it's a crappy game when it's initially announced as an Xbox Exclusive, then turning around and be excited for it coming to the PS4?  It would seem highly logical under those circumstances that Sony enthusiasts want this game in that case.  It likewise, for some would be funny that such a contradiction exists where the game when it's an Xbox One, Xbox 360, PC exclusive isn't a great game, but when the possibility exists that it is coming to the PS4, then it's a great game.  How would one perceive that irony otherwise?  Seriously???

And yes, 2015 would likely be the release date as it doesn't appear that the Xbox One, Xbox 360, or PC release date will be before 2014.  So what is so how is the educated, logical, assumption that 2015 would be a reasonable timeframe to be able to play the game on the PS4 upsetting to anyone??? 

Are we to the point where astute obervation and an educated, logical assumption is a bannable offense on this site? 

The conclusion is wrong, its simple as that. Unless you want to ignore people who STILL dont give a crap about the game. Multiplat or not (present company included). You cant just say all Sony fans want the game to come, that is simply wrong

How was that offensive. Sometimes this is worse then the fucking stasi. I mean he even said you should wait. baning somebody for this is just wrong, and will keep new members away. 


I agree. Sometimes you don't even want to comment.