Captain_Yuri said:
EricHiggin said:
If AMD were to have Zen 3D from the 5600X and up, or even just the 5800X and up, I don't see any prices changing much. I'd assume they'll use the 2017/2018 Intel, as well as GPU market excuse of, 'we have the halo performance parts and therefore the crown so you can pay more for the entire line up, regardless of mid and low tier performance, period'.
Even if AMD only has the 5900X and 5950X as Zen 3D, I don't personally see them lowering the mid tier prices much. Either that or they'll drop mid tier prices so they're borderline acceptable, then they'll add another $100 to the those 3D parts assuming they take the crown back overall. Just offset the mid tier losses by increasing top tier pricing. Intel got away with murder when it came to insane top tier pricing, so little reason why AMD can't either.
|
I think they will drop the 5600x/5800x by a good amount tbh. If they have a 5600X/5800X with V-cache, they should still drop the regular 5600x/5800x by a pretty good margin. Micro-Center and some other retailers are already giving pretty deep discounts for 5800X. You can get a 5800X for only $300 for example which is the price of a 5600X:
https://www.microcenter.com/product/630284/amd-ryzen-7-5800x-vermeer-38ghz-8-core-am4-boxed-processor-heatsink-not-included
I don't think AMD can go Intels route of not dropping prices even if their Halo products end up being faster. The only reason the 5600X/5800X didn't get a price drop until now is because the 5600X was still faster than a 11600K and same for 5800X vs i7. But now that an i5 12600K can beat AMD's entire lineup, we are already seeing those much needed discounts come in. And if Vcache doesn't come down to mid tier CPUs, then the 5600X/5800X will still get discounted because otherwise, there is little to no reason to get either of them over an i5 12600K/12600/12400 let alone the i7. Intel gives you a better platform and better performance.
|
Depends on whether AMD will stop with the old SKU's once they have a 3D version. That could also explain the cost reductions. Even if it were only 3D from 5800X up, I wouldn't be surprised if AMD kept the 5600X price high-ish to try and upsell the 3D 5800X. Though they could in that case make the 5600X extremely competitive while considerably increasing prices on all 3D SKU's assuming they retake the lead in their performance range, even if that were only or mostly for gaming.
Also depends a lot on whether or not AMD thinks they can hold the crown overall in general going forward. Even if Intel takes it back for a few months every year, or remains closely competitive in the mid range more so, if AMD is confident they can always take it back soon after, especially in the top tiers, then there's not near as much reason to be as competitive with pricing across the board. In this case I'd definitely think AMD would push the top tier pricing up as high as they can get away with, though I still don't think they would go for price parity or undercut Intel in the mid range. That makes AMD look weak and makes them less money. I'd guess they'd keep expecting a premium at every tier, though more of a premium as you move up the stack. I agree, at this point, AMD can't get away with the insane prices Intel once had, but they should still be able to get away with more than they are now, assuming their performance leadership continues. If AMD thinks their goose is cooked, then yes, all prices will come down now and when Zen 3D launches.
Last edited by EricHiggin - on 07 November 2021