By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

kirby007 said:
JEMC said:

dont be jelly im 99% sure your in the same boat as i am, to get full benefit from that thing you need to upgrade your whole build

Yeah, I need a full PC refresh before starting to think about new GPUs. But imagine what a great PC you could get with the money this card costs.

Also, I'm not jealous, I'm envious. The Simpsons explained it better:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HG8Yn9FX40c

PS: I hope they free you soon.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Around the Network

Lmao, of course PCgamer locks that Minecraft thread, because it's talking about politics.

Jeez they even threw in the "prob hijacked by a far-right with an axe to grind".

Like, fuck off PCG, you can't have your cake and eat it too, pick one, stop being a tosser.



Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see

So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"

Captain_Yuri said:

Intel claims Core i9-13900K will be 11% faster on average than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X in gaming

https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-claims-core-i9-13900k-will-be-11-faster-on-average-than-amd-ryzen-9-7950x-in-gaming

First party benchmark so take it with a grain of salt. Reviews should be up I think tomorrow..

The 7950X is a tad slower than the 12900K so this looks very likely.

By the way, for those interested, TechPowerUp tested the 4090 with bot ha 5800X and a 12900K with a bunch of games. The 12900K is clearly faster at every resolution: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/rtx-4090-53-games-ryzen-7-5800x-vs-core-i9-12900k/
As to why they used the 5800X and not the 58003D, that's another matter (probably because the first one is more popular and in more systems).

Captain_Yuri said:

AMD RDNA 3 “Navi 31” Rumors: Radeon RX 7000 Flagship With AIBs, 2x Faster Raster & Over 2x Ray Tracing Improvement

https://wccftech.com/amd-rdna-3-radeon-rx-7000-gpu-rumors-2x-raster-over-2x-rt-performance-amazing-tbp-aib-testing/

Take it with a grain of salt cause Greymon. 2x Faster in Raster would mean it's faster than 4090 in Raster but 2x faster in RT would mean a bit above 3090 in RT depending on the test.

The raster performance isn't that surprising. AMD cames from the very bottom when it comes to RT, so it will take time and several iterations until they can catch up. That said, it would have been preferable to clearly outperform Ampere, not being roughy on par with it.

Also, if the chips are now on the hands of AIBs and the cards launch on November 3rd, that doesn't leave time to produce a lot of units... Oh, wait, that no one said that AMD would launch the cards on that day, only that they will announce/reveal them! Wccftech and others should start making that distinction in their articles.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

PS5, Strix 4090, Strix 3080



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Mine came in yesterday, too. Just waiting on the PSU, now.



Around the Network

So, tell us, Yuri. Does it fit in your case?



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

JEMC said:

So, tell us, Yuri. Does it fit in your case?

Length wise yes, width wise is technically yes but the cables are hitting hard against the glass lol. I'll have to buy cable mod cables or something instead of this jank.



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Holy fuck nugget



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Captain_Yuri said:
JEMC said:

So, tell us, Yuri. Does it fit in your case?

Length wise yes, width wise is technically yes but the cables are hitting hard against the glass lol. I'll have to buy cable mod cables or something instead of this jank.

That sucks. But you seem satisfied by the performance of the card.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

JEMC said:
Captain_Yuri said:

AMD RDNA 3 “Navi 31” Rumors: Radeon RX 7000 Flagship With AIBs, 2x Faster Raster & Over 2x Ray Tracing Improvement

https://wccftech.com/amd-rdna-3-radeon-rx-7000-gpu-rumors-2x-raster-over-2x-rt-performance-amazing-tbp-aib-testing/

Take it with a grain of salt cause Greymon. 2x Faster in Raster would mean it's faster than 4090 in Raster but 2x faster in RT would mean a bit above 3090 in RT depending on the test.

The raster performance isn't that surprising. AMD cames from the very bottom when it comes to RT, so it will take time and several iterations until they can catch up. That said, it would have been preferable to clearly outperform Ampere, not being roughy on par with it.

Also, if the chips are now on the hands of AIBs and the cards launch on November 3rd, that doesn't leave time to produce a lot of units... Oh, wait, that no one said that AMD would launch the cards on that day, only that they will announce/reveal them! Wccftech and others should start making that distinction in their articles.

I thought it was already said that the cards themselves launch in December.