| Captain_Yuri said: Intel claims Core i9-13900K will be 11% faster on average than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X in gaming First party benchmark so take it with a grain of salt. Reviews should be up I think tomorrow.. |
The 7950X is a tad slower than the 12900K so this looks very likely.
By the way, for those interested, TechPowerUp tested the 4090 with bot ha 5800X and a 12900K with a bunch of games. The 12900K is clearly faster at every resolution: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/rtx-4090-53-games-ryzen-7-5800x-vs-core-i9-12900k/
As to why they used the 5800X and not the 58003D, that's another matter (probably because the first one is more popular and in more systems).
| Captain_Yuri said: AMD RDNA 3 “Navi 31” Rumors: Radeon RX 7000 Flagship With AIBs, 2x Faster Raster & Over 2x Ray Tracing Improvement Take it with a grain of salt cause Greymon. 2x Faster in Raster would mean it's faster than 4090 in Raster but 2x faster in RT would mean a bit above 3090 in RT depending on the test. |
The raster performance isn't that surprising. AMD cames from the very bottom when it comes to RT, so it will take time and several iterations until they can catch up. That said, it would have been preferable to clearly outperform Ampere, not being roughy on par with it.
Also, if the chips are now on the hands of AIBs and the cards launch on November 3rd, that doesn't leave time to produce a lot of units... Oh, wait, that no one said that AMD would launch the cards on that day, only that they will announce/reveal them! Wccftech and others should start making that distinction in their articles.
Please excuse my bad English.
Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.
Essay Pro