By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

Captain_Yuri said:

Blizzard renames McCree to Cole Cassidy

All we need to do now is wait for Blizz to realise that new name is already associated with being a porn name...

Backpedal incoming. 



Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see

So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"

Around the Network



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Man i liked the name Jesse Mcree. Even during the Overwatch League they started calling him cowboy. So stupid. I didn't even know or care about the dev.

Last edited by green_sky - on 23 October 2021

There can only be one McCree cowboy:

In other news: PCGH posted a big Crysis Remastered Trilogy article with lots of benchmarks.

https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Crysis-Remastered-Trilogy-Spiel-73459/Specials/Crysis-2-Remastered-Benchmarks-Crysis-3-Remastered-Benchmarks-1381661/4/

Crysis 2 Remastered with 4K + RT maxed brings the RX 6900 XT LC down to 25 fps while RTX 2080 Ti + 3070 have average fps from 38 to 85+, depending on their DLSS settings:

In Crysis 3 Remastered the difference is smaller: the RX 6900 XT LC is stuck at 20 fps while RTX 2080 Ti + 3070 have average fps from 22 to 68+, depending on their DLSS settings:

Crysis 2 Remastered with 1440p + RT maxed are playable with the RX 6900 XT LC (47 fps) while RTX 2080 Ti + 3070 have average fps of 60+ without their DLSS boost. In Crysis 3 Remastered they are closer together (without DLSS):



Turing against RDNA 2 GPUs when heavy amounts of Ray Tracing is involved (Especially with DLSS):



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Around the Network
JEMC said:

Indeed. Imagine what could happen if the leap frogging also happened with the GPUs.

Could maybe be the case with RDNA3. Since Lisa Su was already touting last year that it would again gain about 50% performance per Watt just like RDNA 1+2 did. If they catch up on the Raytracing front too, then we'll have a nice match between AMD and NVidia in the GPU market next year.

I expect that AMD will be more efficient than NVidia next gen, but still not quite on par with the NVidia cards in terms of top performance or functions. The gap in terms of functions and their respective performance will definitely get smaller next gen compared to this one however I think.



Bofferbrauer2 said:
JEMC said:

Indeed. Imagine what could happen if the leap frogging also happened with the GPUs.

Could maybe be the case with RDNA3. Since Lisa Su was already touting last year that it would again gain about 50% performance per Watt just like RDNA 1+2 did. If they catch up on the Raytracing front too, then we'll have a nice match between AMD and NVidia in the GPU market next year.

I expect that AMD will be more efficient than NVidia next gen, but still not quite on par with the NVidia cards in terms of top performance or functions. The gap in terms of functions and their respective performance will definitely get smaller next gen compared to this one however I think.

While that's true, and I really hope AMD delivers on all fronts with RDNA3, Nvidia has also claimed a similar performance jump from Ampere to Lovelace as the one we saw from Turing to Ampere. Nvidia won't be so easy to beat as Intel.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Intel Alder Lake Mobility CPU Benchmarks Leaked: Faster Than The Apple M1 Max, Smokes AMD 5980HX, 11980HK

https://wccftech.com/intel-alder-lake-mobility-cpu-benchmarks-leaked-faster-than-the-apple-m1-max-smokes-amd-5980hx-11980hk/

Take it with a grain of salt but...



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

JEMC said:
Bofferbrauer2 said:

Could maybe be the case with RDNA3. Since Lisa Su was already touting last year that it would again gain about 50% performance per Watt just like RDNA 1+2 did. If they catch up on the Raytracing front too, then we'll have a nice match between AMD and NVidia in the GPU market next year.

I expect that AMD will be more efficient than NVidia next gen, but still not quite on par with the NVidia cards in terms of top performance or functions. The gap in terms of functions and their respective performance will definitely get smaller next gen compared to this one however I think.

While that's true, and I really hope AMD delivers on all fronts with RDNA3, Nvidia has also claimed a similar performance jump from Ampere to Lovelace as the one we saw from Turing to Ampere. Nvidia won't be so easy to beat as Intel.

Hence why I think that the performance crown stays ultimately in the NVidia camp. Where it would get more interesting is in the mobile market if AMD is more efficient by some margin, as this could give AMD more marketshare in mobile.



If true, Apple will (should) commit seppuku.

Last edited by green_sky - on 23 October 2021