It's a mixed reality headset, it doesn't need high refresh rates. 

It's not that surprising given that, if I'm not mistaken, it's the first time I've posted an article about this game.

Well noted! Who sells more in each segment shows us that the gaming/enthusiast is clearly shifting towards AMD.

Still, it's a shame AMD has so many supply issues because, by the looks of it, it could have sold as many processors as it wanted.

Thermaltake shamelessly copied Noctua's latest fan design, changed the color and made it cheaper with keeping a very similar performance:

Personally, while I don't like it when companies shamelessly copy and paste, the main problem with Noctua is their slow release of additional color options. So while the Noctua's brown fans are still slightly superior, I for one don't mind this since they do perform quite similarly.

Cheaper and in black.. instead of garish browns. Only difference being is the motor being slightly worse.

But yeah that blatant copy and paste lol

In other news Mass Effect LE going to be censored. I don't usually get annoyed at video game devs but shit whatever.. EA doesn't want my money anyways :)

https://boundingintocomics.com/2021/02/04/bioware-to-edit-sexualized-cutscenes-in-mass-effect-legendary-edition/

Sounds like I'll be sticking with the originals

Yeah I don't support censorship in my games. Just on principle alone, even over a small little thing like changed camera angles. Thanks but no thanks Bioware.

Will stick to original unless modders can change it back to what it should be. Really some unneeded/unwarranted changes there, damn wokeness!

I've only played the first game and don't remember much of it, but if some of the camera angles really were like what's shown in that article, then yeah, I do support reworking them. Some of those angles just don't seem to make much sense beyond trying to cater to a certain male audience, which, in my opinion, doesn't suit a game like Mass Effect. I don't personally mind the angles, but they certainly don't do anything to improve the game itself - they seem like they're there simply to cater to a certain audience. It's OK for some games but I recall Mass Effect feeling too serious for that kind of stuff.

I really dig in this Demo-bonanza on Steam. Some games already very nice, but most of them you can't map buttons or you an't change resolution (or you get stuck while changing resolution ^^). However a better move than paid-QA/Early-access

That the character of Miranda was "too sexual" is so obvious that no one can deny it, although I'm not sure if all those shots in the article appear in the game or can be forced moving the camera.

Still, if that is a problem for EA, then it should have done something about it when the original game launched, not now. Now it's too late and the only thing that they'll achieve with it is piss of potential customers that don't like censorchip in their games, specially if it's retroactive.

If I'm honest, I don't like this nor the previous festivals.

Don't get me wrong, I love that they're promoting the games and that small, indie games get the spotlight, but I don't think they're doing it quite right because there's a lot of games and, in such short amount of time, it's impossible to go through all of them, even less try them.

I think Steam should evolve this festival thing and do it more regularly and also genre based. Making one every one or two months based on a couple of genres, and then change those genres during the year, would give us more time to check all the titles and also try them, which is what all of this is about in the end, right?