Conina said:
2 x 8K? So 2 x 7640 x 4320 = 66 MegaPixel per frame or ~6 GigaPixel per second? Ouch! Even the 20 MegaPixel per frame or ~1.8 GigaPixel per second to get the best out of my current VR-headset is too much for my new PC... maybe with a RTX 4080/4090 in two years. *pic* |
It's a mixed reality headset, it doesn't need high refresh rates.
TallSilhouette said:
How did I not know about this sooner?! |
It's not that surprising given that, if I'm not mistaken, it's the first time I've posted an article about this game.
Bofferbrauer2 said:
Just as some additional information, the increase from Intel comes mostly from the low-end, as in Pentium and especially Atom chips, many of which aparently went into chromebooks. The same increase however didn't happen on the mid-range or high-end market. As a result, after the curious blip last month (in December, intel processors in the 2.7-3ghz range had an almost 50% increase, which is gone again now), AMD is back to stealing market share from Intel, reaching 28% market share under Windows and 33.5% under Linux. Speaking about steam and stock issues, Polaris, Vega and 1st gen Navi all have quite big increases, probably all due to the fact that they were actually available to buy... |
Well noted! Who sells more in each segment shows us that the gaming/enthusiast is clearly shifting towards AMD.
Still, it's a shame AMD has so many supply issues because, by the looks of it, it could have sold as many processors as it wanted.
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.







