At least I don't care about online
BasilZero said:
There was no reason to say that people had double standards. That wasnt the point of the topic - you managed to cause a ripple effect with one post that eventually derailed more than half of the replies in this topic. |
The people who called my post stupid and idiotic caused the shitstorm. I would have just quietly listened to those disagreeing and address them calmly, which was going fine. So don't blame me for something I didn't do.
Also, I don't care if you think the why might have nothing to do with justifying PS+ for multiplayer. Your opinion doesn't matter, even if it's your thread.
happydolphin said:
The people who called my post stupid and idiotic caused the shitstorm. I would have just quietly listened to those disagreeing and address them calmly, which was going fine. So don't blame me for something I didn't do. Also, I don't care if you think the why might have nothing to do with justifying PS+ for multiplayer. Your opinion doesn't matter, even if it's your thread. |
O_O
Leave Basil alone asshole !!
Shinobi-san said:
O_O Leave Basil alone asshole !! |
If someone comes at me, I've got my bat in hand, bro.
happydolphin said: 1. It wasn't, but even if it was I was correct. So it doesn't matter. 2. I explained the statistics thing already. I don't care if you disagree. You won't convince me. I don't have the memory to remember exactly each person. I read "Sony fan", "MS fan", "Nintendo fan" and I make estimates. This far I was pleasantly surprised but the start of the thread did not give me much hope. 3. I don't care what the mods think. I disagreed with you, and I thought you didn't make sense calling his post an insult. Use your brain for a second here. You said my post was presumptuous. Is that supposed to be an insult now? |
1. Do you know what "presumptuous" means?
2. You have explained nothing. We are talking about CARL's post. You have failed to provide any examples of double-standards for CARL>
3. Clearly, I was speaking within the context of forum rules.
BasilZero said:
Neither does your opinion, especially a OFF TOPIC opinion - you had no reason to say "Double Standards" in this topic - you brought it up and you are acting like your the victim? Dont pretend or hide, you came in here to attract attention and to bait people which you did. This isnt the first time either. |
That's your opinion. It wasn't off topic AT ALL.
If that were the case, how many off topic people were ranting against MS's DRM policies when the articles were detailing the what.
Again, double-standards.
@Jay[point3]. I wasn't. When I said get real, I was talking about your judgement call.
Jay520 said:
|
Look. If you want me to get down to the core of it all: stop playing down the bad parts of your peoples culture. My camp doesn't; we embrace it. The "proof proof proof" card is tired.
That's why I responded to your origional bait post, you shockingly said that only "a few" did a 180 on their stance on paywalls, and that just aint right.
I'm sure Micro claimed the same when charging for online play came about. I still have yet to see why we pay except them claiming the servers are better.
BasilZero said:
Yes it was, you called out people for having double standards. THE NAME OF THE TOPIC IS : Sony explains why PS Plus is required for PS4 online playNot double standards and not what sony fans view the services between the Xbox and Playstation. @Bolded/italic/underlined - and that gives you reason to derail my thread? Nice logic. |
The why = the justification. I'm bang on topic to say that it's unacceptable after the history of hate MS got for something similar.
And it is a double-standard.
A thread full of denial lol.
Everyone knew this was coming and the reason why. Microsoft fans have said for years the Live infrastructure is superior due to the funding the Live fees brought in, it was obvious Sony would need a similar investment this coming generation. Hopefully they'll try and innovate with the extra investment they're being given.