By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Could MK8, Bayo2 and X run on a PS3[60]

 

could they?

yes 280 32.52%
 
no 341 39.61%
 
maybe one of them could 124 14.40%
 
maybe two of them could 41 4.76%
 
see results 75 8.71%
 
Total:861
teigaga on 22 June 2013
ninjablade said:

All games are i posted all look more technically advanced then anything seen on wiiu, this is the highest quality picf of X on the net and its looks very unimpressive tech wise.


1stly none of the games you described are anywhere as demanding as X.

Halo 4: Narrow/scripted, the background is a skybox not interactive environmets. Doesn't look as X anyway.

God of War A: Extremely narrow/scripted, arguably looks better than X but not as technically demanding.

Red Dead Redemption: Thats a nice screen shot  but no.

in X's defence there are no direct feed videos of it (Again Nintendo's failure to push the title), but we haven't had current gen games look like this, especially not on this scale. Ultimately its a subjective thing but it does look like X is using DirectX 10 equivalent lighting. Same with Mario Kart 8




 ti



Around the Network
ninjablade on 22 June 2013
MDMAlliance said:
ninjablade said:
TheLastStarFighter said:
No, not as shown. You could absolutely bring them over, but you would lose some lighting, resolution and framerate.


lighting looks very average, and we don't how good the frame rate is, and we don't even know the resolution its running on.


MK8's lighting is above average, the framerate is confirmed to be 60fps, and I think it was also confirmed to be 1080p.  

Bayonetta is, at the least, confirmed to run 60fps.  

and I really think you don't know what you're talking about.

i was talking about X, baynetta runs 60fps on 360 and baynetta 2 looks about the same to me, as for mario kart it looks  nice, but i think GT4 and forza 4 look much better, but its not a fair comparison.



ninjablade on 22 June 2013
teigaga said:
ninjablade said:

All games are i posted all look more technically advanced then anything seen on wiiu, this is the highest quality picf of X on the net and its looks very unimpressive tech wise.


1stly none of the games you described are anywhere as demanding as X.

Halo 4: Narrow/scripted, the background is a skybox not interactive environmets. Doesn't look as X anyway.

God of War A: Extremely narrow/scripted, arguably looks better than X but not as technically demanding.

Red Dead Redemption: Thats a nice screen shot  but no.

in X's defence there are no direct feed videos of it (Again Nintendo's failure to push the title), but we haven't had current gen games look like this, especially not on this scale. Ultimately its a subjective thing but it does look like X is using DirectX 10 equivalent lighting. Same with Mario Kart 8




 ti


halo 4 looks so much better to me its not even funny and so does RDR, X lighting looks very unimpressive when compared to RDR and its using 2d sprites for its foliage, anyway there is no direct feed footage of x so thats why people saying it can't done on current gen have no argument.



orniletter on 22 June 2013

With graphical sacrifices ? Yes

Could Killzone 4 and Infamous 3 run on the PS3 ? With graphical sacrifices, yes !



MDMAlliance on 22 June 2013
ninjablade said:

i was talking about X, baynetta runs 60fps on 360 and baynetta 2 looks about the same to me, as for mario kart it looks  nice, but i think GT4 and forza 4 look much better, but its not a fair comparison.


and it still has time to clean up some of the textures in the second picture (I know that you are going to point it out that the textures of the spikes and the blood aren't very good, but look at pretty much everything else)

360 Bayonetta:



Around the Network
maybetomorrow on 22 June 2013
ninjablade said:
MDMAlliance said:
ninjablade said:
TheLastStarFighter said:
No, not as shown. You could absolutely bring them over, but you would lose some lighting, resolution and framerate.


lighting looks very average, and we don't how good the frame rate is, and we don't even know the resolution its running on.


MK8's lighting is above average, the framerate is confirmed to be 60fps, and I think it was also confirmed to be 1080p.  

Bayonetta is, at the least, confirmed to run 60fps.  

and I really think you don't know what you're talking about.

i was talking about X, baynetta runs 60fps on 360 and baynetta 2 looks about the same to me, as for mario kart it looks  nice, but i think GT4 and forza 4 look much better, but its not a fair comparison.

Kid, go to the oculist please and and keep talking that mess. GT and Forza have the same visual style? which stupidest comparison



BlkPaladin on 22 June 2013

You know you can make any game play on an older system if you are willing to put some work into it. (And remove some visuals, etc.). Any engine can be made to run on any modern system. All it take is time and the will to do it. So when you read a developer saying this game or engine cannot be put on the system, it is because they do not want to do it.



ninjablade on 22 June 2013

MDMAlliance said:
ninjablade said:

i was talking about X, baynetta runs 60fps on 360 and baynetta 2 looks about the same to me, as for mario kart it looks  nice, but i think GT4 and forza 4 look much better, but its not a fair comparison.


and it still has time to clean up some of the textures in the second picture (I know that you are going to point it out that the textures of the spikes and the blood aren't very good, but look at pretty much everything else)

360 Bayonetta:


baynotetta was a very very ugly game on 360 and it continues the tradition on wiiu but it looks a bit better., cause its coming out like 3 years later, so of course it gonna look better cause they removed the use of the horrible yellow bloom filter, still to say it looks impressive especially based on those pics is none sense IMO.



MDMAlliance on 22 June 2013
ninjablade said:

MDMAlliance said:
ninjablade said:

i was talking about X, baynetta runs 60fps on 360 and baynetta 2 looks about the same to me, as for mario kart it looks  nice, but i think GT4 and forza 4 look much better, but its not a fair comparison.


and it still has time to clean up some of the textures in the second picture (I know that you are going to point it out that the textures of the spikes and the blood aren't very good, but look at pretty much everything else)

360 Bayonetta:


baynotetta was a very very ugly game on 360 and it continues the tradition on wiiu but it looks a bit better., cause its coming out like 3 years later, so of course it gonna look better cause they removed the use of the horrible yellow bloom filter, still to say it looks impressive especially based on those pics is none sense IMO.


The thing here is that even an untrained eye can see the difference and you earlier said you couldn't even see what the difference was.  Looking side by side, even at some of the original's best screenshots don't compare to even some of the worse ones for Wii U (unfinished).



ninjablade on 22 June 2013
MDMAlliance said:
ninjablade said:

MDMAlliance said:
ninjablade said:

i was talking about X, baynetta runs 60fps on 360 and baynetta 2 looks about the same to me, as for mario kart it looks  nice, but i think GT4 and forza 4 look much better, but its not a fair comparison.


and it still has time to clean up some of the textures in the second picture (I know that you are going to point it out that the textures of the spikes and the blood aren't very good, but look at pretty much everything else)

360 Bayonetta:


baynotetta was a very very ugly game on 360 and it continues the tradition on wiiu but it looks a bit better., cause its coming out like 3 years later, so of course it gonna look better cause they removed the use of the horrible yellow bloom filter, still to say it looks impressive especially based on those pics is none sense IMO.


The thing here is that even an untrained eye can see the difference and you earlier said you couldn't even see what the difference was.  Looking side by side, even at some of the original's best screenshots don't compare to even some of the worse ones for Wii U (unfinished).

I  was tallking tech wise, they look pretty close, except fpor the better art dirrection and use of collor.