By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Could MK8, Bayo2 and X run on a PS3[60]

 

could they?

yes 280 32.52%
 
no 341 39.61%
 
maybe one of them could 124 14.40%
 
maybe two of them could 41 4.76%
 
see results 75 8.71%
 
Total:861
hinch on 23 June 2013
cbarroso09 said:


bayonetta 2 is confirmed to run 60pfs, so if you see X running the same, it is running at 60fps. What is not confrmed is the resolution at which all games are running.

Indeed it is. Although, from the sounds of it, they still some way to go for it to run at smooth and stable 60FPS through and through. But Kamiya did say on twitter that is what he is aiming for (in the final game).

And I very much doubt X is going to be running at 60FPS with that kind of scale and fidelity. If the devs haven't boasted about it by now, its likely to be just the standard 30FPS.



Around the Network
Zero999 on 23 June 2013
ninjablade said:
Leadified said:
ninjablade said:
Zero999 said:

Pictures are everywhere inlcuding in this topic. it's not my problem if you just ignore them and keep lying to yourself.


and i also wanna point out even though god of war 3 runs at 45-60 fps its looks like a generation ahead of baynetta 2 interms of graphics, as for mario kart yea its the best looking cart game on consoles but its the only exclusive one, techically GT5/GT6 and forza 4 and horizoone smoke it.


Haha okay. Keep telling yourself that.


Thanks for giving in and showing bayonetta 2 looks better than GOW3.



Zero999 on 23 June 2013
ninjablade said:
Leadified said:
ninjablade said:
Leadified said:


Haha okay. Keep telling yourself that.



Thank you for proving my point.


well to each his own, that second pics is actaully gameplay and its not an insult to bayaneeta 2 cause the god of war franshise on ps3 crushes evrything sinlge action game graphically, if your viewing then in full rez, i can't see how don't see it.

I see higher level of detail in every aspect for bayonetta 2. and don't forget it actually has big open scenarios, unlike GOW.



dahuman on 23 June 2013
HoloDust said:
dahuman said:
HoloDust said:
Let's wait and see how MGSV and GTAV look on PS360.


I wouldn't count on GTA5, that thing looks massively cel-shaded which would save a ton of RAM by design so while looking great, won't be as technically impressive as something like X, MGSV looks really nice too, just not as much draw distance and is pretty much a ton of desert, and we'll see on that one since all the videos I saw had really good AA, and unless it's some form of really optimized MLAA, I'd just call it bullshit.

The first time I saw it, I wasn't that impressed with MGSV, especially self-shadowing was bothering me a lot. Then, after Kojima's statement that trailer was tuned to current gen, I became quite impressed and interested if they are really able to pull something close to that on current gen - that's why I want to see it on PS360 before I make any judgment.

I thought X looked ok, I haven't really seen too much of next-gen tech inside that trailer tbh, and some things even looked quite bland (that city walk scene  for example). Still, it's decent looking game, and I'm sure that Monolith will make it as beautiful as possible (specially for people who like that art style) - it's just it hasn't really wowed me in absolutely any way, but, as I said in one of post-E3 threads, even Witcher 3 that is leagues ahead of it, hasn't really impressed me that much for next-gen title (I'm hoping Cyberpunk 2077 will manage to do that).

As for X running on PS360 in same fidelity...I really doubt it, if WiiU's GPU is indeed 320 shader part (and has 32 TMUs, what I'm suspecting). Does it look better than any open world game on PS360...some things maybe, some not so much, that's why I started with MGSV and GTAV...unlike what some people here are led to believe, WiiU is not THAT above PS360, so it might very much come to Rockstar and Kojima having better/bigger teams that determines the answer.


I'm very interested in MGSV for sure, I especially hope they'd just release it on PC since I'd most likely pre order it whereas I'd wait for price drop of used on PS3. X is not at the quality of ZOMG IMO but that's not why I loved Xenoblade so better graphics is more like a bonus. I just don't know why people who are obviously not trained to know what they are looking at would sprout so much BS sometimes(not refering to you). Those are the kind of people that need a gaming PC more than anything else if they really want to get into a decent graphics discussion  after a lot of PC gaming IMO.



Zero999 on 23 June 2013
ninjablade said:
Zero999 said:
ninjablade said:

 

please show me these direct feed pics that show the upgrade. the wiiu is gonna be out for a year and it won't have the best looking game in any genre this year compared to current gen.

Pictures are everywhere inlcuding in this topic. it's not my problem if you just ignore them and keep lying to yourself.


and i also wanna point out even though god of war 3 runs at 45-60 fps its looks like a generation ahead of baynetta 2 interms of graphics, as for mario kart yea its the best looking cart game on consoles but its the only exclusive one, techically GT5/GT6 and forza 4 and horizoone smoke it.

omg that has to be yor record. YOU'RE COMPARING A GAME THAT TRIES TO BE FOTO REALISTC WITH ONE OF THE MOST CARTOONY GAMES. the only similarity is that they're both racing games.



Around the Network
Zero999 on 23 June 2013
hinch said:
cbarroso09 said:


bayonetta 2 is confirmed to run 60pfs, so if you see X running the same, it is running at 60fps. What is not confrmed is the resolution at which all games are running.

Indeed it is. Although, from the sounds of it, they still some way to go for it to run at smooth and stable 60FPS through and through. But Kamiya did say on twitter that is what he is aiming for (in the final game).

And I very much doubt X is going to be running at 60FPS with that kind of scale and fidelity. If the devs haven't boasted about it by now, its likely to be just the standard 30FPS.

nintendo didn't boast 60 fps for their games, we got confirmation through direct feeds. X is one of the games that has almost no information so your argument is flawed.



hinch on 23 June 2013
Zero999 said:

nintendo didn't boast 60 fps for their games, we got confirmation through direct feeds. X is one of the games that has almost no information so your argument is flawed.

Arguement? Wut. Show me a link, then.



Zero999 on 23 June 2013
hinch said:
Zero999 said:

nintendo didn't boast 60 fps for their games, we got confirmation through direct feeds. X is one of the games that has almost no information so your argument is flawed.

Arguement? Wut. Show me a link, then.

your argument is that devs didn't boast about 60 fps, but that doesn't mean anything.



Andrespetmonkey on 23 June 2013

Definitely but probably with drawbacks



My Music

hinch on 23 June 2013
Zero999 said:
hinch said:
Zero999 said:

nintendo didn't boast 60 fps for their games, we got confirmation through direct feeds. X is one of the games that has almost no information so your argument is flawed.

Arguement? Wut. Show me a link, then.

your argument is that devs didn't boast about 60 fps, but that doesn't mean anything.

Well they didn't mention it specifically in there so why are you expecting it to be 60FPS? I'm just judging from the Wii U specs we know (also rumoured specs), software which is running on the system then giving out an estimation.

Besides, when was the last console game that's running at 60FPS, wasn't pointed out as a key point by the developer. Anyway, I can't be arsed to "argue" with someone who's not willing to enter a discussion without being so dismissive about it, so I bid you adieu.

Edit: Oh and I was wrong about MK8 being 1080p. Its 720p with no AA judging from this screenshot.