theprof00 said:
disolitude said:
BenVTrigger said:
disolitude said: They just want to be ahead of the curve.
In 2-3 years, retail based sales should be dwarfed by digital. And since there will be no selling, trading or sharing of games on digital any time soon, EA can relax and play the good guy now to reap the benefits later. |
Not happening.
Maybe in 6-7 years.
|
I'm not so sure. So many other eletronic entertainment devices are going this route. Smart TVs, cellphones, tablets, PCs...
Once people see that downloaded games auto update while disk based games update when you insert the disk...
Once people see how fast app switching works for digital while for disks you have to wait for loading and switch manually yourself...
Once people see that PS4 offers game streaming to the Vita any tiem anywhere, but only for games you bought digitally, while CD games you have to put the disk in and play from home...
|
Except it's not an all or nothing proposal.
Why are you defending inflexibility?
|
I am not defending the idea of digial only gaming or lack of choice.
I am defending the idea of a different approach to the industry in terms of business, economics and technology.
PS4 already does disks and no internet checks, great! People in Afganistan can play that... We will see where that business model leads and what cool technology comes of it (hint: we're already seeing it this gen)
I would have liked to see the different approach from Xbox One and see what it does to the business and economics side of things and what technology can be utilized with all digital gaming.
For example, what if Microsoft introduces a handheld streaming console like Nvidia Shield that plays your library of games? This handheld can be used any time anywhere since your whole library is digital, it can stream these games from the cloud. But now that your library is half disc based, the only way to stream that is to insert the disk in to console and play from home, which is completely useless.
I realize that market has spoken and they want the same old, and I really can't present any arguments why Microsofts approach would have been better since I am not a Microsoft employee. It may not have been better...it may have been worse. But it would have been new and different and provide much needed differentiation and choice between the "HD twins".