Super Mario Cats - What Are Your Impressions After Playing It!? <(^

Lonely_Dolphin

Currently Offline

70,842

17152 posts since 26/03/13

Recent Badges:

Haunted Logged in on Halloween.
Mighty Heart Logged in on Valentine's Day.
6 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 6 years.
9 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 9 years.
So You Came Back For More, Huh? Logged in a second time.
'Ello Princess! Awarded for signing up.

Lonely_Dolphin on 16 June 2013

Cobretti2 said:

Einsam_Delphin said:

Cobretti2 said:
It isnt so much that the game is BAD it is just that people wanted an open world mario with a free moving camera and not fixed angels.

This game would be a blast on the 3DS i am sure.

I know they locked it so that multiplayer would work locally..

However i think they should have focused on online multiplayer. That way the players have free range to run around all over the level and do quests, or you could all go down the same path. But since you got your own TV the angel limitations do not matter.

Ah, so they just set themselves up for disappointment. I always try not to get hyped or have expectations other than the next Mario will be Mario, the next CoD will be CoD, the next Halo will be Halo, etc. Lowers disappointment or raises amazement. But what's wrong with the camera? Worked fine in SM3DL, works just as well here. You can see all you need to see. And again what's with this better on 3DS stuff? How would the same exact game magically be better on 3DS? o_O

Because mario 64 has set the stadnard for all 3D marios on consoles. People are expecting free movement and adjustable camera. It is just a mind set, crazy I know but that is the expectation. Just like when Metroi Prime turennd into Metroid Other M. Not that the game was bad but it wasn't what people wanted lol.

3DS has always uses this hybrid 2D/3D fixed style, hence why I think it would suit the 3DS better as one already existed on there.

That is pretty crazy, as you can still freely move and this camera angle does not affect gameplay, which again is still the same.

That wouldn't make the game better. It'd still be played exactly the same. =/

Lonely_Dolphin

Currently Offline

70,842

17152 posts since 26/03/13

Recent Badges:

Haunted Logged in on Halloween.
1st Birthday Has been a VGChartz member for over 1 year.
'Ello Princess! Awarded for signing up.
The High Flyer Earned 40 badges.
Pon Received 100 wall post comments on gamrConnect.
Don't Forget To Save 10 status updates.

Lonely_Dolphin on 16 June 2013

CarcharodonKraz said:
I've said this quite a few times before. This game is going to be the 1st in a new franchise (2nd if 3dmarioland counts... never played it) and should not be lumped in with galaxy and the like. I'm pretty sure that's why people are hating on it. It's just not what they were expecting. That said i played it and loved it. I can't wait to be able to play through with my friends. While it may bum the galaxy loving crowd out a bit, it was great for me as i haven't liked a single 3dmario game to date. This was different. And to all those will the hand held comments; not all of us are on board with handheld gaming. It's just not a sensible platform for me which is why i've never played 3dland. If you want the new galaxy, you just need to be patient. Can't wait to finally buy a super mario with a combat system to my liking with power ups that aren't just set pieces. :)

Glad yah liked it aswell! I would think 3D land counts as part of this series since they both have 3D in their names and share the same camera angles and artstyle. And yeah, sounds like this be Wind Waker all over again. Lot's of hate for looking different, yet it still turned out to be a great game. Funny how one second they're bashing games for not being different, then the next they're bashing games for being different.