Lucas-Rio said:
|
It will get lower scores, and I'm happy because this shows that Nintendo don't care about them anymore.
Agree? | |||
| Yes | 143 | 34.79% | |
| No | 267 | 64.96% | |
| Total: | 410 | ||
Lucas-Rio said:
|
It will get lower scores, and I'm happy because this shows that Nintendo don't care about them anymore.
AshKetchum1992 said:
Why? |
Mario Galaxy 2 is more lazy because it is called Galaxy 2.
Meanwhile, Mario 3D World isn't named Mario 3d Land 2 (eventough he is Mario 3D land 2), so it's less lazy
AshKetchum1992 said:
Why? |
They said themselves that the majority of the game was just levels cut from the game. It features many of the same ideas and power ups, bosses ans world concepts, and took but a few months to make.
That doesn't stop it from eing crazy good, though. I think people need to remember that.
Lucas-Rio said:
It isn't risked, it will get 75-80% in reviews, which is what Nintendo is targeting with this low budget game. It's a basic game, with basic levels, basic assets.... Next step is to create a programm at Nintendo which will make such games itselfs, without devleopper input. |
You are making an assumption. Nintendo has only shown four levels and yet you are already jumping the gun. Word of advice, do not judge this game so quickly, especially since it is a Mario game. I remember when Skyword Sword was revealed, everyone wrote the game off quickly. As time went by, as more footage was shown, Skyword Swords quality was beginning to reveal itself, then fans faith was renewing again. Mind you, skyward sword isn't the best zelda game but it was an incredible game notheless. What i am getting at, is that just need to be a little patient, there could be more to it than what we have seen.

| AshKetchum1992 said: @Lucas-Rio Are you being sarcastic? |
Yes I was.
mii-gamer said:
You are making an assumption. Nintendo has only shown four levels and yet you are already jumping the gun. Word of advice, do not judge this game so quickly, especially since it is a Mario game. I remember when Skyword Sword was revealed, everyone wrote the game off quickly. As time went by, as more footage was shown, Skyword Swords quality was beginning to reveal itself, then fans faith was renewing again. Mind you, skyward sword isn't the best zelda game but it was an incredible game notheless. What i am getting at, is that just need to be a little patient, there could be more to it than what we have seen. |
Skyward Sword wasn't the follow up of Spirit Tracks.
Mario 3D world is the follow up of Mario 3D Land, Iwata said it. That's the huge difference. We knew Zelda was ambitious, that it was the Nintendo game which had the biggest budget ever.
We know Mario 3D world is a low budget, 3DS kind of games.
Lucas-Rio said:
Skyward Sword wasn't the follow up of Spirit Tracks. Mario 3D world is the follow up of Mario 3D Land, Iwata said it. That's the huge difference. We knew Zelda was ambitious, that it was the Nintendo game which had the biggest budget ever. We know Mario 3D world is a low budget, 3DS kind of games. |
you are missing the point. Read the bold

It will surely sell better than Mario Galaxy, many people didn't like the 3D and Sphere Style of Galaxy and will appreciate the 4-Player-Modus.
But I hope a Mario Galaxy 3 will be announced in 2014.
| mii-gamer said:
|
The point is that SS is a 50 hours adventure game and that Mario 3D world is a platformer.
You can judge 50% of how a platformer is going to be on the first trailer.
People knew Mario Galaxy would be awesome for the first trailer, they knew DKCR would be great as well. You can see that Mario 3D world will be average and can't be great.